Navigate
AI BENCHY
Advertise here

AI BENCHY Compare

Anthropic: Claude Opus 4.8 vs Google: Gemma 4 31B

Summary

Claude Opus 4.8 vs Gemma 4 31B benchmark comparison: Claude Opus 4.8 leads on average score with 7.2 vs 6.3. Gemma 4 31B has the lower benchmark cost at $0.033 vs $0.539. Claude Opus 4.8 is faster at 3.47s vs 56.55s, with pass rates of 61.9% vs 69.8%.

Recommended model: Claude Opus 4.8 - It has the best score here (7.2), while responding about 16.3x faster than Gemma 4 31B.

Last updated at: 2026-06-18

Metric Claude Opus 4.8 Claude Opus 4.8 none Release: 2026-05-28 Gemma 4 31B Gemma 4 31B medium Release: 2026-04-02 Free Available
Score 7.2 6.3
Rank #57 #88
Reliability 10.0 10.0
Consistency 9.2 9.4
Tests Correct
Attempt pass rate 61.9% 69.8%
Flaky tests 2 1
Total Runs 63 63
Cost per result 4.485 0.257
Total Cost $0.539 $0.033
Input Price $5.000 / 1M $0.120 / 1M
Output Price $25.000 / 1M $0.350 / 1M
Total Input Tokens 67,104 17,957
Output Tokens 8,107 22,356
Reasoning Tokens 0 65,726
Response Time (avg) 3.47s 56.55s
Response Time (max) 17.73s 437.40s
Response Time (total) 72.90s 1074.41s

Generation showcase

Hamster playing table tennis

Prompt: Create a detailed SVG illustration of a hamster playing table tennis.

#57 Claude Opus 4.8

none
Cost
$0.053
Time
22.0s
Tokens
2,253 tok

#88 Gemma 4 31B

medium
Cost
$0.002
Time
45.7s
Tokens
2,696 tok

Top Models by Score

Score vs Total Cost

Response Time (avg)

Score vs Response Time (avg)

Total Output Tokens

Score vs Total Output Tokens

Category Breakdown

Anti-AI Tricks Score Consistency Attempt pass rate Flaky tests Tests Correct Response Time (avg) Input Tokens Output Tokens Reasoning Tokens
Claude Opus 4.8 6.5 10.0 50.0% 0 3.40s 834 1,472 0
Gemma 4 31B 10.0 10.0 100.0% 0 12.89s 816 962 2,046
Coding Score Consistency Attempt pass rate Flaky tests Tests Correct Response Time (avg) Input Tokens Output Tokens Reasoning Tokens
Claude Opus 4.8 5.5 10.0 33.3% 0 3.29s 10,590 1,332 0
Gemma 4 31B 4.3 5.8 22.2% 1 219.76s 5,568 11,098 33,212
Combined Score Consistency Attempt pass rate Flaky tests Tests Correct Response Time (avg) Input Tokens Output Tokens Reasoning Tokens
Claude Opus 4.8 9.5 10.0 100.0% 0 17.73s 29,658 3,259 0
Gemma 4 31B 3.0 10.0 0.0% 0 0ms 0 0 0
Data parsing and extraction Score Consistency Attempt pass rate Flaky tests Tests Correct Response Time (avg) Input Tokens Output Tokens Reasoning Tokens
Claude Opus 4.8 7.3 5.8 83.3% 1 1.77s 10,503 308 0
Gemma 4 31B 10.0 10.0 100.0% 0 21.11s 8,334 1,822 2,951
Domain specific Score Consistency Attempt pass rate Flaky tests Tests Correct Response Time (avg) Input Tokens Output Tokens Reasoning Tokens
Claude Opus 4.8 5.3 7.2 44.4% 1 1.66s 975 61 0
Gemma 4 31B 7.7 10.0 66.7% 0 38.48s 876 4,349 8,985
General Intelligence Score Consistency Attempt pass rate Flaky tests Tests Correct Response Time (avg) Input Tokens Output Tokens Reasoning Tokens
Claude Opus 4.8 10.0 10.0 100.0% 0 3.48s 708 230 0
Gemma 4 31B 10.0 10.0 100.0% 0 9.57s 567 105 888
Instructions following Score Consistency Attempt pass rate Flaky tests Tests Correct Response Time (avg) Input Tokens Output Tokens Reasoning Tokens
Claude Opus 4.8 9.9 10.0 100.0% 0 1.37s 909 95 0
Gemma 4 31B 10.0 10.0 100.0% 0 12.76s 777 533 2,035
Puzzle Solving Score Consistency Attempt pass rate Flaky tests Tests Correct Response Time (avg) Input Tokens Output Tokens Reasoning Tokens
Claude Opus 4.8 7.7 10.0 66.7% 0 2.74s 894 783 0
Gemma 4 31B 9.9 10.0 100.0% 0 26.91s 801 1,795 5,595
Tool Calling Score Consistency Attempt pass rate Flaky tests Tests Correct Response Time (avg) Input Tokens Output Tokens Reasoning Tokens
Claude Opus 4.8 10.0 10.0 100.0% 0 5.35s 11,775 355 0
Gemma 4 31B 3.0 10.0 0.0% 0 0ms 0 0 0
Trivia Score Consistency Attempt pass rate Flaky tests Tests Correct Response Time (avg) Input Tokens Output Tokens Reasoning Tokens
Claude Opus 4.8 3.0 10.0 0.0% 0 3.41s 258 212 0
Gemma 4 31B 3.0 10.0 0.0% 0 90.14s 218 1,692 10,014

Quick Compare

Switch Comparison Pair