Navigate
AI BENCHY
Advertise here

KAT-Coder-Pro V2.5 (high) vs Qwen3.7 Flash (low)

The average score is effectively tied at 7.2 vs 7.3. Qwen3.7 Flash (low) has the lower benchmark cost at $0.042 vs $0.482. KAT-Coder-Pro V2.5 (high) is faster at 20.83s vs 36.80s, with pass rates of 63.6% vs 68.2%.

Last updated at: 2026-07-28

Rank
#79
Total Output Tokens
136,164
Response Time (avg)
20.83s
Total Cost
$0.482
Rank
#75
Total Output Tokens
297,249
Response Time (avg)
36.80s
Total Cost
$0.042
Recommended model Qwen3.7 Flash (low)

It has the best score here (7.3), while costing about 11.6x less than KAT-Coder-Pro V2.5 (high).

Detailed comparison

Metric KAT-Coder-Pro V2.5 KAT-Coder-Pro V2.5 high Release: 2026-07-14 Qwen3.7 Flash Qwen3.7 Flash low Release: 2026-07-28
Score 7.2 7.3
Rank #79 #75
Reliability 10.0 9.9
Consistency 7.8 8.4
Tests Correct
Attempt pass rate 63.6% 68.2%
Flaky tests 6 5
Total Runs 66 66
Cost per result 4.378 0.346
Total Cost $0.482 $0.042
Input Price $0.740 / 1M $0.030 / 1M
Output Price $2.960 / 1M $0.130 / 1M
Total Input Tokens 106,076 92,182
Output Tokens 9,071 14,287
Reasoning Tokens 127,093 282,962
Response Time (avg) 20.83s 36.80s
Response Time (max) 199.97s 394.54s
Response Time (total) 458.31s 809.54s

Hamster playing table tennis

Prompt: Create a detailed SVG illustration of a hamster playing table tennis.

#79 KAT-Coder-Pro V2.5

high
Cost
$0.009
Time
26.4s
Tokens
3,117 tok

#75 Qwen3.7 Flash

low
Invalid SVG
Cost
$0.000
Time
600.0s
Tokens
0 tok

Top Models by Score

Score vs Total Cost

Response Time (avg)

Score vs Response Time (avg)

Total Output Tokens

Score vs Total Output Tokens

Category Breakdown

Coding Score Consistency Attempt pass rate Flaky tests Tests Correct Response Time (avg) Input Tokens Output Tokens Reasoning Tokens
KAT-Coder-Pro V2.5 6.4 7.9 44.4% 1 22.00s 7,893 422 20,461
Qwen3.7 Flash 6.7 7.8 55.6% 1 42.36s 7,893 428 56,419

Quick Compare

Switch Comparison Pair