- Rank
- #146
- Total Output Tokens
- 144,359
- Response Time (avg)
- 22.11s
- Total Cost
- $0.506
KAT-Coder-Pro V2.5 (high) vs Muse Glimmer 30B (medium)
KAT-Coder-Pro V2.5 (high) leads on average score with 7.2 vs 7.2. Muse Glimmer 30B (medium) has the lower benchmark cost at $0.227 vs $0.506. KAT-Coder-Pro V2.5 (high) is faster at 22.11s vs 30.64s, with pass rates of 63.6% vs 63.6%.
Compared models
- Rank
- #151
- Total Output Tokens
- 168,074
- Response Time (avg)
- 30.64s
- Total Cost
- $0.227
Recommended model
Muse Glimmer 30B (medium)
Its score stays close to the best score here (7.2 vs 7.2), while costing about 2.2x less than KAT-Coder-Pro V2.5 (high).
Detailed comparison
| Metric | KAT-Coder-Pro V2.5 KAT-Coder-Pro V2.5 high | Muse Glimmer 30B Muse Glimmer 30B medium |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 7.2 | 7.2 |
| Rank | #146 | #151 |
| Reliability | 10.0 | 10.0 |
| Consistency | 7.8 | 7.9 |
| Attempts | 66/66 | 66/66 |
| Tests Correct | ||
| Attempt pass rate | 63.6% | 63.6% |
| Flaky tests | 6 | 6 |
| Total Runs | 66 | 66 |
| Cost per result | 4.599 | 2.543 |
| Total Cost | $0.506 | $0.227 |
| Input Price | $0.740 / 1M | $0.300 / 1M |
| Output Price | $2.960 / 1M | $1.200 / 1M |
| Total Input Tokens | 106,085 | 116,513 |
| Output Tokens | 9,071 | 33,065 |
| Reasoning Tokens | 135,288 | 135,009 |
| Response Time (avg) | 22.11s | 30.64s |
| Response Time (max) | 199.97s | 181.08s |
| Response Time (total) | 486.31s | 674.01s |
| Parameters | ~700B total (~72B active) | 30B |
| Availability | Closed | Open source |
Model generation showcase
Hamster playing table tennis
Prompt: Create a detailed SVG illustration of a hamster playing table tennis.
#146 KAT-Coder-Pro V2.5
high- Cost
- $0.009
- Time
- 26.4s
- Tokens
- 3,117 tok
#151 Muse Glimmer 30B
medium- Cost
- $0.003
- Time
- 31.9s
- Tokens
- 1,845 tok
Top Models by Score
Score vs Total Cost
Response Time (avg)
Score vs Response Time (avg)
Total Output Tokens
Score vs Total Output Tokens
Category Breakdown
| Anti-AI Tricks | Score | Consistency | Attempt pass rate | Flaky tests | Tests Correct | Response Time (avg) | Input Tokens | Output Tokens | Reasoning Tokens |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| KAT-Coder-Pro V2.5 | 7.0 | 8.0 | 66.7% | 1 | 3.17s | 672 | 447 | 2,716 | |
| Muse Glimmer 30B | 9.2 | 8.4 | 91.7% | 1 | 7.36s | 810 | 1,183 | 5,164 |
| Coding | Score | Consistency | Attempt pass rate | Flaky tests | Tests Correct | Response Time (avg) | Input Tokens | Output Tokens | Reasoning Tokens |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| KAT-Coder-Pro V2.5 | 6.4 | 7.9 | 44.4% | 1 | 22.00s | 7,893 | 422 | 20,461 | |
| Muse Glimmer 30B | 8.4 | 7.8 | 77.8% | 1 | 33.67s | 7,419 | 4,662 | 20,605 |
| Combined | Score | Consistency | Attempt pass rate | Flaky tests | Tests Correct | Response Time (avg) | Input Tokens | Output Tokens | Reasoning Tokens |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| KAT-Coder-Pro V2.5 | 7.3 | 5.8 | 83.3% | 1 | 106.70s | 78,458 | 6,956 | 60,306 | |
| Muse Glimmer 30B | 6.5 | 10.0 | 50.0% | 0 | 76.48s | 88,472 | 4,448 | 29,477 |
| Data parsing and extraction | Score | Consistency | Attempt pass rate | Flaky tests | Tests Correct | Response Time (avg) | Input Tokens | Output Tokens | Reasoning Tokens |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| KAT-Coder-Pro V2.5 | 10.0 | 10.0 | 100.0% | 0 | 4.13s | 7,776 | 278 | 1,960 | |
| Muse Glimmer 30B | 7.3 | 5.9 | 83.3% | 1 | 7.20s | 7,065 | 2,570 | 3,513 |
| Domain specific | Score | Consistency | Attempt pass rate | Flaky tests | Tests Correct | Response Time (avg) | Input Tokens | Output Tokens | Reasoning Tokens |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| KAT-Coder-Pro V2.5 | 2.9 | 4.4 | 22.2% | 2 | 44.66s | 780 | 33 | 43,896 | |
| Muse Glimmer 30B | 2.9 | 7.2 | 11.1% | 1 | 44.62s | 885 | 10,588 | 25,769 |
| General Intelligence | Score | Consistency | Attempt pass rate | Flaky tests | Tests Correct | Response Time (avg) | Input Tokens | Output Tokens | Reasoning Tokens |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| KAT-Coder-Pro V2.5 | 5.1 | 10.0 | 0.0% | 0 | 3.27s | 516 | 139 | 647 | |
| Muse Glimmer 30B | 4.7 | 9.8 | 0.0% | 0 | 5.16s | 525 | 1,312 | 1,379 |
| Instructions following | Score | Consistency | Attempt pass rate | Flaky tests | Tests Correct | Response Time (avg) | Input Tokens | Output Tokens | Reasoning Tokens |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| KAT-Coder-Pro V2.5 | 9.9 | 10.0 | 100.0% | 0 | 2.67s | 699 | 84 | 976 | |
| Muse Glimmer 30B | 9.8 | 10.0 | 100.0% | 0 | 5.34s | 765 | 1,206 | 2,359 |
| Puzzle Solving | Score | Consistency | Attempt pass rate | Flaky tests | Tests Correct | Response Time (avg) | Input Tokens | Output Tokens | Reasoning Tokens |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| KAT-Coder-Pro V2.5 | 8.2 | 7.2 | 88.9% | 1 | 3.38s | 696 | 428 | 1,936 | |
| Muse Glimmer 30B | 6.0 | 4.6 | 66.7% | 2 | 64.73s | 795 | 6,278 | 39,397 |
| Tool Calling | Score | Consistency | Attempt pass rate | Flaky tests | Tests Correct | Response Time (avg) | Input Tokens | Output Tokens | Reasoning Tokens |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| KAT-Coder-Pro V2.5 | 10.0 | 10.0 | 100.0% | 0 | 28.04s | 8,391 | 268 | 896 | |
| Muse Glimmer 30B | 10.0 | 10.0 | 100.0% | 0 | 5.64s | 9,546 | 320 | 839 |
| Trivia | Score | Consistency | Attempt pass rate | Flaky tests | Tests Correct | Response Time (avg) | Input Tokens | Output Tokens | Reasoning Tokens |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| KAT-Coder-Pro V2.5 | 3.0 | 10.0 | 0.0% | 0 | 5.22s | 204 | 16 | 1,494 | |
| Muse Glimmer 30B | 3.0 | 10.0 | 0.0% | 0 | 26.69s | 231 | 498 | 6,507 |
Quick Compare
Switch Comparison Pair
Muse Glimmer 30BmediumvsQwen3.7 FlashlowKAT-Coder-Pro V2.5highvsKimi K2.6mediumMuse Glimmer 30BmediumvsGPT-6 SolnoneKAT-Coder-Pro V2.5highvsGPT-6 SolnoneKAT-Coder-Pro V2.5highvsQwen3.5 Plus 2026-04-20mediumClaude Opus 4.8nonevsKAT-Coder-Pro V2.5highMuse Glimmer 30BmediumvsStep 3.7 FlashlowDeepSeek V4 Flash 0731mediumvsKAT-Coder-Pro V2.5highKAT-Coder-Pro V2.5highvsQwen3.7 FlashlowKAT-Coder-Pro V2.5highvsQwen3.7 PlusnoneMuse Glimmer 30BmediumvsSolar Pro 4highGemini 3.1 Flash LitemediumvsKAT-Coder-Pro V2.5high