- Score
- 7.5 (-0.14 points)
- Total Cost (Current Price)
- $0.000 · 100.0% cheaper
- Response Time (avg)
- 29.38s · 13.5% faster
Meta
Release: 2026-08-11
Tested on: 2026-10-01 03:11
meta/muse-glimmer-30b::medium
30BDenseOpen source
Summary
Muse Glimmer 30B scores 7.7 on AI BENCHY and ranks #168. It has 10.0 reliability, a 65.2% pass rate, $0.288 total cost, and 33.97s average response time.
Recommended alternatives
We recommend choosing one of these models instead:
- Score
- 8.6 (+0.90 points)
- Total Cost (Current Price)
- $0.061 · 78.9% cheaper
- Response Time (avg)
- 7.51s · 77.9% faster
- Score
- 9.4 (+1.68 points)
- Total Cost (Current Price)
- $0.183 · 36.5% cheaper
- Response Time (avg)
- 6.24s · 81.6% faster
Model facts
Researched on 2026-08-12
- Parameters
- 30B
- Architecture
- Dense
- Availability
- Open source
- License
- Apache-2.0
7.7
Consistency
8.0
10.0
Total Output Tokens
171,888
Total Input Tokens
269,497
Input Price
$0.300 / 1M
Output Price
$1.200 / 1M
Cache Read Price
$0.040 / 1M
Cache Write Price
N/A
Cache prices apply to input tokens. Reads reuse cached prompts; writes store them and can cost extra. Output tokens use the output price.
Flaky tests
6
Flaky tests had mixed outcomes across runs (at least one pass and one fail).
Hamster playing table tennis
Prompt: Create a detailed SVG illustration of a hamster playing table tennis.
#168 Muse Glimmer 30B
medium- Cost
- $0.003
- Time
- 31.9s
- Tokens
- 1,845 tok
Run history
| Tested on | Score | Reliability | Tests Correct | Total Cost | Compare |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2026-10-01 03:11 Re-test | 7.7 | 10.0 | $0.288 ↓ | Current run | |
| 2026-08-11 10:06 Initial run | 7.2 | 10.0 | $0.279 | Compare |
This run used a different benchmark suite. Keep suite changes in mind when reading historical movement.
Price History
Historical pricing data for this model from OpenRouter.
| Date | Input Price | Output Price | Cache Read Price | Cache Write Price |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2026-08-14 12:51 | $0.350 / 1M | $1.500 / 1M | N/A | N/A |
| 2026-10-06 14:54 | $0.300 / 1M | $1.200 / 1M | $0.040 / 1M | N/A |
Charts
Choose the first model, then click a second model to open a side-by-side page.
Top Models by Score
Score vs Total Cost
Response Time (avg)
Score vs Response Time (avg)
Total Output Tokens
Score vs Total Output Tokens
Quick Compare
Muse Glimmer 30BmediumvsQwen3.7 FlashlowMuse Glimmer 30BmediumvsMuse WonderxhighMuse Glimmer 30BmediumvsQwen3.5 Plus 2026-04-20mediumMuse Glimmer 30BmediumvsQwen3.8 Flash NextmediumMuse Glimmer 30BmediumvsClaude Haiku 5.5mediumMuse Glimmer 30BmediumvsGPT-6 LunalowMuse Glimmer 30BmediumvsNemotron 3.5 Super VLmediumFree AvailableMuse Glimmer 30BmediumvsQwen3.8 27BlowFree AvailableMuse Glimmer 30BmediumvsMuse Glimmer 30BhighMuse Glimmer 30BmediumvsSpace Bunny Alphahigh
Category Breakdown
| Category | Score | Consistency | Tests Correct |
|---|---|---|---|
| Agentic | 10.0 | 10.0 | |
| Anti-AI Tricks | 9.2 | 8.4 | |
| Coding | 8.4 | 7.8 | |
| Combined | 6.5 | 10.0 | |
| Data parsing and extraction | 7.3 | 5.9 | |
| Domain specific | 2.9 | 7.2 | |
| General Intelligence | 4.7 | 9.8 | |
| Instructions following | 9.8 | 10.0 | |
| Puzzle Solving | 6.0 | 4.6 | |
| Tool Calling | 10.0 | 10.0 | |
| Trivia | 3.0 | 10.0 |