- Score
- 9.4 (+1.72 points)
- Total Cost (Current Price)
- $0.183 · 95.5% cheaper
- Response Time (avg)
- 6.24s · 81.9% faster
Summary
Muse Wonder scores 7.7 on AI BENCHY and ranks #129. It has 9.1 reliability, a 65.2% pass rate, $4.012 total cost, and 34.40s average response time.
What makes Muse Wonder unique: It stands out most in Coding, where it ranks #1, while Agentic is its weakest area at #16.
Recommended alternatives
We recommend choosing one of these models instead:
- Score
- 8.6 (+0.93 points)
- Total Cost (Current Price)
- $0.061 · 98.5% cheaper
- Response Time (avg)
- 7.51s · 78.2% faster
- Score
- 9.6 (+1.91 points)
- Total Cost (Current Price)
- $0.460 · 88.6% cheaper
- Response Time (avg)
- 7.15s · 79.2% faster
Model facts
Researched on 2026-10-13
- Parameters
- ~1T total (~50B active)
- Architecture
- MoE
- Availability
- Closed
- License
- -
Best estimate from public evidence; the vendor did not disclose every value. Meta does not disclose parameter counts or dense-versus-MoE architecture for this exact checkpoint. The 1T total / 50B active MoE values are a provisional, low-confidence catalog estimate carried from the Muse Spark family; they are not vendor-reported or measured Muse Wonder specifications. Available through Meta Model API and OpenRouter with no official public weights or checkpoint license. Wonder Full is a separate subscription-only model, not the max effort of this API checkpoint. Supports minimal, low, medium, high, xhigh and max reasoning; none is explicitly unsupported. Meta keeps raw reasoning private; OpenRouter returns reasoning summaries and provider-reported reasoning-token usage.
7.7
Consistency
9.3
9.1
$4.012
Total Output Tokens
181,988
Total Input Tokens
93,060
Input Price
$4.000 / 1M
Output Price
$20.000 / 1M
Cache Read Price
$0.200 / 1M
Cache Write Price
N/A
Cache prices apply to input tokens. Reads reuse cached prompts; writes store them and can cost extra. Output tokens use the output price.
Flaky tests
2
Flaky tests had mixed outcomes across runs (at least one pass and one fail).
Hamster playing table tennis
Prompt: Create a detailed SVG illustration of a hamster playing table tennis.
#129 Muse Wonder
xhigh- Cost
- $0.266
- Time
- 95.4s
- Tokens
- 13,379 tok
Charts
Choose the first model, then click a second model to open a side-by-side page.
Top Models by Score
Score vs Total Cost
Response Time (avg)
Score vs Response Time (avg)
Total Output Tokens
Score vs Total Output Tokens
Quick Compare
Category Breakdown
| Category | Score | Consistency | Tests Correct |
|---|---|---|---|
| Agentic | 3.0 | 10.0 | |
| Anti-AI Tricks | 8.3 | 10.0 | |
| Coding | 10.0 | 10.0 | |
| Combined | 10.0 | 10.0 | |
| Data parsing and extraction | 10.0 | 10.0 | |
| Domain specific | 3.6 | 7.2 | |
| General Intelligence | 10.0 | 10.0 | |
| Instructions following | 6.5 | 10.0 | |
| Puzzle Solving | 5.3 | 10.0 | |
| Tool Calling | 10.0 | 10.0 | |
| Trivia | 2.8 | 1.6 |