- Score
- 9.4 (+0.26 points)
- Total Cost (Current Price)
- $0.183 · 93.1% cheaper
- Response Time (avg)
- 6.24s · 61.0% faster
Summary
Muse Wonder scores 9.1 on AI BENCHY and ranks #38. It has 9.7 reliability, a 76.8% pass rate, $2.637 total cost, and 16.00s average response time.
What makes Muse Wonder unique: It stands out most in Domain specific, where it ranks #4, while Puzzle Solving is its weakest area at #16.
Recommended alternatives
We recommend choosing one of these models instead:
- Score
- 9.1 (+0.02 points)
- Total Cost (Current Price)
- $0.140 · 94.7% cheaper
- Response Time (avg)
- 16.58s · 3.7% slower
- Score
- 9.6 (+0.45 points)
- Total Cost (Current Price)
- $0.460 · 82.6% cheaper
- Response Time (avg)
- 7.15s · 55.3% faster
Model facts
Researched on 2026-10-13
- Parameters
- ~1T total (~50B active)
- Architecture
- MoE
- Availability
- Closed
- License
- -
Best estimate from public evidence; the vendor did not disclose every value. Meta does not disclose parameter counts or dense-versus-MoE architecture for this exact checkpoint. The 1T total / 50B active MoE values are a provisional, low-confidence catalog estimate carried from the Muse Spark family; they are not vendor-reported or measured Muse Wonder specifications. Available through Meta Model API and OpenRouter with no official public weights or checkpoint license. Wonder Full is a separate subscription-only model, not the max effort of this API checkpoint. Supports minimal, low, medium, high, xhigh and max reasoning; none is explicitly unsupported. Meta keeps raw reasoning private; OpenRouter returns reasoning summaries and provider-reported reasoning-token usage.
9.1
Consistency
9.6
9.7
$2.637
Total Output Tokens
82,847
Total Input Tokens
244,997
Input Price
$4.000 / 1M
Output Price
$20.000 / 1M
Cache Read Price
$0.200 / 1M
Cache Write Price
N/A
Cache prices apply to input tokens. Reads reuse cached prompts; writes store them and can cost extra. Output tokens use the output price.
Flaky tests
1
Flaky tests had mixed outcomes across runs (at least one pass and one fail).
Hamster playing table tennis
Prompt: Create a detailed SVG illustration of a hamster playing table tennis.
#38 Muse Wonder
low- Cost
- $0.080
- Time
- 28.1s
- Tokens
- 4,067 tok
Charts
Choose the first model, then click a second model to open a side-by-side page.
Top Models by Score
Score vs Total Cost
Response Time (avg)
Score vs Response Time (avg)
Total Output Tokens
Score vs Total Output Tokens
Quick Compare
Category Breakdown
| Category | Score | Consistency | Tests Correct |
|---|---|---|---|
| Agentic | 10.0 | 10.0 | |
| Anti-AI Tricks | 10.0 | 10.0 | |
| Coding | 10.0 | 10.0 | |
| Combined | 10.0 | 10.0 | |
| Data parsing and extraction | 10.0 | 10.0 | |
| Domain specific | 5.3 | 10.0 | |
| General Intelligence | 10.0 | 10.0 | |
| Instructions following | 6.5 | 10.0 | |
| Puzzle Solving | 5.9 | 7.2 | |
| Tool Calling | 9.8 | 10.0 | |
| Trivia | 3.0 | 10.0 |