- Score
- 9.4 (+0.27 points)
- Total Cost (Current Price)
- $0.183 · 88.0% cheaper
- Response Time (avg)
- 6.24s · 81.4% faster
Unbiased
Release: 2026-09-18
Tested on: 2026-09-30 23:45
unbiased/pareto::none
-OtherClosed Summary
Pareto scores 9.1 on AI BENCHY and ranks #37. It has 10.0 reliability, a 87.0% pass rate, $1.520 total cost, and 33.47s average response time.
What makes Pareto unique: It stands out most in Domain specific, where it ranks #1, while Combined is its weakest area at #17.
Recommended alternatives
We recommend choosing one of these models instead:
- Score
- 9.1 (+0.02 points)
- Total Cost (Current Price)
- $0.140 · 90.8% cheaper
- Response Time (avg)
- 16.58s · 50.5% faster
- Score
- 9.6 (+0.46 points)
- Total Cost (Current Price)
- $0.460 · 69.8% cheaper
- Response Time (avg)
- 7.15s · 78.6% faster
Model facts
Researched on 2026-09-18
- Parameters
- -
- Architecture
- Other
- Availability
- Closed
- License
- -
API-only composite model. The vendor describes running multiple models and selecting an answer, rather than a single dense or MoE checkpoint. Constituent models and a meaningful total or active parameter count are not disclosed. OpenRouter exposes no reasoning control for this ID.
9.1
Consistency
9.2
10.0
$1.520
Total Output Tokens
128,144
Total Input Tokens
223,559
Input Price
$2.500 / 1M
Output Price
$7.500 / 1M
Cache Read Price
$0.250 / 1M
Cache Write Price
N/A
Cache prices apply to input tokens. Reads reuse cached prompts; writes store them and can cost extra. Output tokens use the output price.
Flaky tests
2
Flaky tests had mixed outcomes across runs (at least one pass and one fail).
Hamster playing table tennis
Prompt: Create a detailed SVG illustration of a hamster playing table tennis.
#37 Pareto
default- Cost
- $0.034
- Time
- 170.7s
- Tokens
- 4,581 tok
Price History
Historical pricing data for this model from OpenRouter.
| Date | Input Price | Output Price | Cache Read Price | Cache Write Price |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2026-10-01 18:33 | $2.500 / 1M | $7.500 / 1M | $0.250 / 1M | N/A |
Charts
Choose the first model, then click a second model to open a side-by-side page.
Top Models by Score
Score vs Total Cost
Response Time (avg)
Score vs Response Time (avg)
Total Output Tokens
Score vs Total Output Tokens
Quick Compare
ParetodefaultvsMuse Spark 1.3highParetodefaultvsSeed 2.1 TurbohighParetodefaultvsClaude Haiku 5.5xhighParetodefaultvsGemini 3.5 FlashlowParetodefaultvsGPT-5.3-CodexmediumParetodefaultvsQwen3.8 Max (0902)mediumParetodefaultvsQwen3.8 Max (0902)highParetodefaultvsMuse Spark 1.3mediumParetodefaultvsQwen3.8 MAXmediumParetodefaultvsGemini 3.5 Flash Litehigh
Category Breakdown
| Category | Score | Consistency | Tests Correct |
|---|---|---|---|
| Agentic | 10.0 | 10.0 | |
| Anti-AI Tricks | 10.0 | 10.0 | |
| Coding | 10.0 | 10.0 | |
| Combined | 7.2 | 9.1 | |
| Data parsing and extraction | 10.0 | 10.0 | |
| Domain specific | 7.7 | 10.0 | |
| General Intelligence | 10.0 | 10.0 | |
| Instructions following | 10.0 | 10.0 | |
| Puzzle Solving | 8.2 | 7.2 | |
| Tool Calling | 10.0 | 10.0 | |
| Trivia | 2.8 | 1.6 |