Navigate
Advertise here

Seed 2.1 Turbo (high) vs Pareto

The average score is effectively tied at 8.9 vs 8.9. Pareto has the lower benchmark cost at $1.172 vs $1.797. Pareto is faster at 31.51s vs 173.96s, with pass rates of 78.8% vs 86.4%.

Last updated at: 2026-09-18

Compared models

Rank
#35
Total Output Tokens
697,731
Response Time (avg)
173.96s
Total Cost
$1.797
Rank
#34
Total Output Tokens
119,230
Response Time (avg)
31.51s
Total Cost
$1.172
Recommended model Pareto

It has the best score here (8.9), while costing about 1.5x less than Seed 2.1 Turbo (high).

Detailed comparison

Metric Seed 2.1 Turbo Seed 2.1 Turbo high Release: 2026-08-12 Pareto Pareto none Release: 2026-09-18
Score 8.9 8.9
Rank #35 #34
Reliability 10.0 10.0
Consistency 8.9 9.2
Attempts 66/66 66/66
Tests Correct
Attempt pass rate 78.8% 86.4%
Flaky tests 3 2
Total Runs 66 66
Cost per result 11.230 6.506
Total Cost $1.797 $1.172
Input Price $0.500 / 1M $2.500 / 1M
Output Price $2.500 / 1M $7.500 / 1M
Total Input Tokens 104,695 110,734
Output Tokens 6,645 119,230
Reasoning Tokens 691,086 0
Response Time (avg) 173.96s 31.51s
Response Time (max) 584.71s 143.33s
Response Time (total) 3827.19s 693.29s
Parameters ~200B total (~20B active) -
Availability Closed Closed

Model generation showcase

Hamster playing table tennis

Prompt: Create a detailed SVG illustration of a hamster playing table tennis.

#35 Seed 2.1 Turbo

high
Cost
$0.058
Time
355.4s
Tokens
23,053 tok

#34 Pareto

none
Cost
$0.034
Time
170.7s
Tokens
4,581 tok

Top Models by Score

Score vs Total Cost

Response Time (avg)

Score vs Response Time (avg)

Total Output Tokens

Score vs Total Output Tokens

Category Breakdown

Coding Score Consistency Attempt pass rate Flaky tests Tests Correct Response Time (avg) Input Tokens Output Tokens Reasoning Tokens
Seed 2.1 Turbo 10.0 10.0 100.0% 0 336.02s 8,220 370 194,578
Pareto 10.0 10.0 100.0% 0 50.12s 7,471 1,949 0

Quick Compare

Switch Comparison Pair