Navigate
Advertise here

Gemini 3.5 Flash (low) vs Pareto

Pareto leads on average score with 8.9 vs 8.8. Gemini 3.5 Flash (low) has the lower benchmark cost at $0.449 vs $1.172. Gemini 3.5 Flash (low) is faster at 5.76s vs 31.51s, with pass rates of 84.9% vs 86.4%.

Last updated at: 2026-09-18

Compared models

Rank
#36
Total Output Tokens
35,195
Response Time (avg)
5.76s
Total Cost
$0.449
Rank
#34
Total Output Tokens
119,230
Response Time (avg)
31.51s
Total Cost
$1.172
Recommended model Gemini 3.5 Flash (low)

Its score stays close to the best score here (8.8 vs 8.9), while costing about 2.6x less than Pareto.

Detailed comparison

Metric Gemini 3.5 Flash Gemini 3.5 Flash low Release: 2026-05-19 Pareto Pareto none Release: 2026-09-18
Score 8.8 8.9
Rank #36 #34
Reliability 10.0 10.0
Consistency 9.3 9.2
Attempts 66/66 66/66
Tests Correct
Attempt pass rate 84.9% 86.4%
Flaky tests 2 2
Total Runs 66 66
Cost per result 2.492 6.506
Total Cost $0.449 $1.172
Input Price $1.500 / 1M $2.500 / 1M
Output Price $9.000 / 1M $7.500 / 1M
Total Input Tokens 87,826 110,734
Output Tokens 2,239 119,230
Reasoning Tokens 32,956 0
Response Time (avg) 5.76s 31.51s
Response Time (max) 53.55s 143.33s
Response Time (total) 126.71s 693.29s
Parameters ~500B total (~20B active) -
Availability Closed Closed

Model generation showcase

Hamster playing table tennis

Prompt: Create a detailed SVG illustration of a hamster playing table tennis.

#36 Gemini 3.5 Flash

low
Cost
$0.068
Time
39.1s
Tokens
7,588 tok

#34 Pareto

none
Cost
$0.034
Time
170.7s
Tokens
4,581 tok

Top Models by Score

Score vs Total Cost

Response Time (avg)

Score vs Response Time (avg)

Total Output Tokens

Score vs Total Output Tokens

Category Breakdown

Coding Score Consistency Attempt pass rate Flaky tests Tests Correct Response Time (avg) Input Tokens Output Tokens Reasoning Tokens
Gemini 3.5 Flash 7.8 10.0 66.7% 0 6.71s 8,118 458 13,420
Pareto 10.0 10.0 100.0% 0 50.12s 7,471 1,949 0

Quick Compare

Switch Comparison Pair