- Rank
- #35
- Total Output Tokens
- 35,195
- Response Time (avg)
- 5.76s
- Total Cost
- $0.449
Gemini 3.5 Flash (low) vs Qwen3.8 Max (0902) (medium)
The average score is effectively tied at 8.8 vs 8.8. Gemini 3.5 Flash (low) has the lower benchmark cost at $0.449 vs $0.677. Gemini 3.5 Flash (low) is faster at 5.76s vs 26.01s, with pass rates of 84.9% vs 83.3%.
- Rank
- #36
- Total Output Tokens
- 80,678
- Response Time (avg)
- 26.01s
- Total Cost
- $0.677
Recommended model
Gemini 3.5 Flash (low)
It has the best score here (8.8), while costing about 1.5x less than Qwen3.8 Max (0902) (medium).
Detailed comparison
| Metric | Gemini 3.5 Flash Gemini 3.5 Flash low | Qwen3.8 Max (0902) Qwen3.8 Max (0902) medium |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 8.8 | 8.8 |
| Rank | #35 | #36 |
| Reliability | 10.0 | 10.0 |
| Consistency | 9.3 | 9.3 |
| Attempts | 66/66 | 66/66 |
| Tests Correct | ||
| Attempt pass rate | 84.9% | 83.3% |
| Flaky tests | 2 | 2 |
| Total Runs | 66 | 66 |
| Cost per result | 2.492 | 3.981 |
| Total Cost | $0.449 | $0.677 |
| Input Price | $1.500 / 1M | $2.000 / 1M |
| Output Price | $9.000 / 1M | $6.000 / 1M |
| Total Input Tokens | 87,826 | 96,323 |
| Output Tokens | 2,239 | 5,961 |
| Reasoning Tokens | 32,956 | 74,717 |
| Response Time (avg) | 5.76s | 26.01s |
| Response Time (max) | 53.55s | 168.09s |
| Response Time (total) | 126.71s | 572.19s |
| Parameters | ~500B total (~20B active) | 2.4T total (~100B active) |
| Availability | Closed | Closed |
Model generation showcase
Hamster playing table tennis
Prompt: Create a detailed SVG illustration of a hamster playing table tennis.
#35 Gemini 3.5 Flash
low- Cost
- $0.068
- Time
- 39.1s
- Tokens
- 7,588 tok
#36 Qwen3.8 Max (0902)
medium- Cost
- $0.036
- Time
- 108.3s
- Tokens
- 5,980 tok
Top Models by Score
Score vs Total Cost
Response Time (avg)
Score vs Response Time (avg)
Total Output Tokens
Score vs Total Output Tokens
Category Breakdown
| Anti-AI Tricks | Score | Consistency | Attempt pass rate | Flaky tests | Tests Correct | Response Time (avg) | Input Tokens | Output Tokens | Reasoning Tokens |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Gemini 3.5 Flash | 10.0 | 10.0 | 100.0% | 0 | 2.52s | 494 | 209 | 2,536 | |
| Qwen3.8 Max (0902) | 10.0 | 10.0 | 100.0% | 0 | 5.03s | 672 | 295 | 2,003 |
| Coding | Score | Consistency | Attempt pass rate | Flaky tests | Tests Correct | Response Time (avg) | Input Tokens | Output Tokens | Reasoning Tokens |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Gemini 3.5 Flash | 7.8 | 10.0 | 66.7% | 0 | 6.71s | 8,118 | 458 | 13,420 | |
| Qwen3.8 Max (0902) | 8.4 | 7.4 | 88.9% | 1 | 45.74s | 7,893 | 551 | 20,628 |
| Combined | Score | Consistency | Attempt pass rate | Flaky tests | Tests Correct | Response Time (avg) | Input Tokens | Output Tokens | Reasoning Tokens |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Gemini 3.5 Flash | 8.2 | 6.9 | 66.7% | 1 | 29.99s | 63,752 | 557 | 3,713 | |
| Qwen3.8 Max (0902) | 10.0 | 10.0 | 100.0% | 0 | 94.38s | 68,852 | 3,895 | 24,303 |
| Data parsing and extraction | Score | Consistency | Attempt pass rate | Flaky tests | Tests Correct | Response Time (avg) | Input Tokens | Output Tokens | Reasoning Tokens |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Gemini 3.5 Flash | 10.0 | 10.0 | 100.0% | 0 | 1.81s | 7,548 | 279 | 1,164 | |
| Qwen3.8 Max (0902) | 10.0 | 10.0 | 100.0% | 0 | 10.54s | 7,782 | 261 | 2,591 |
| Domain specific | Score | Consistency | Attempt pass rate | Flaky tests | Tests Correct | Response Time (avg) | Input Tokens | Output Tokens | Reasoning Tokens |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Gemini 3.5 Flash | 5.3 | 7.2 | 44.4% | 1 | 4.89s | 642 | 12 | 6,312 | |
| Qwen3.8 Max (0902) | 3.6 | 7.2 | 22.2% | 1 | 49.45s | 780 | 44 | 19,572 |
| General Intelligence | Score | Consistency | Attempt pass rate | Flaky tests | Tests Correct | Response Time (avg) | Input Tokens | Output Tokens | Reasoning Tokens |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Gemini 3.5 Flash | 10.0 | 10.0 | 100.0% | 0 | 2.27s | 486 | 119 | 916 | |
| Qwen3.8 Max (0902) | 10.0 | 10.0 | 100.0% | 0 | 7.56s | 516 | 202 | 689 |
| Instructions following | Score | Consistency | Attempt pass rate | Flaky tests | Tests Correct | Response Time (avg) | Input Tokens | Output Tokens | Reasoning Tokens |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Gemini 3.5 Flash | 9.9 | 10.0 | 100.0% | 0 | 1.86s | 615 | 71 | 1,652 | |
| Qwen3.8 Max (0902) | 10.0 | 10.0 | 100.0% | 0 | 4.24s | 699 | 90 | 886 |
| Puzzle Solving | Score | Consistency | Attempt pass rate | Flaky tests | Tests Correct | Response Time (avg) | Input Tokens | Output Tokens | Reasoning Tokens |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Gemini 3.5 Flash | 10.0 | 10.0 | 100.0% | 0 | 2.35s | 558 | 288 | 2,150 | |
| Qwen3.8 Max (0902) | 10.0 | 10.0 | 100.0% | 0 | 5.89s | 696 | 353 | 1,599 |
| Tool Calling | Score | Consistency | Attempt pass rate | Flaky tests | Tests Correct | Response Time (avg) | Input Tokens | Output Tokens | Reasoning Tokens |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Gemini 3.5 Flash | 10.0 | 10.0 | 100.0% | 0 | 3.27s | 5,457 | 234 | 403 | |
| Qwen3.8 Max (0902) | 10.0 | 10.0 | 100.0% | 0 | 5.93s | 8,229 | 249 | 194 |
| Trivia | Score | Consistency | Attempt pass rate | Flaky tests | Tests Correct | Response Time (avg) | Input Tokens | Output Tokens | Reasoning Tokens |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Gemini 3.5 Flash | 10.0 | 10.0 | 100.0% | 0 | 1.88s | 156 | 12 | 690 | |
| Qwen3.8 Max (0902) | 3.0 | 10.0 | 0.0% | 0 | 17.01s | 204 | 21 | 2,252 |
Quick Compare
Switch Comparison Pair
Gemini 3.5 Flash LitehighvsQwen3.8 Max (0902)mediumGemini 3.5 FlashlowvsMuse Spark 1.3mediumClaude Opus 4.8mediumvsGemini 3.5 FlashlowClaude Opus 5lowvsQwen3.8 Max (0902)mediumGemini 3.6 FlashlowvsQwen3.8 Max (0902)mediumQwen3.8 Max (0902)mediumvsGLM 5.3 FlashmaxSeed 2.1 TurbohighvsGemini 3.5 FlashlowGemini 3.5 FlashlowvsGLM 5.3 FlashmaxClaude Opus 4.7mediumvsGemini 3.5 FlashlowSeed 2.1 TurbohighvsQwen3.8 Max (0902)mediumGemini 3.5 FlashlowvsMuse Spark 1.3highGemini 3.5 FlashlowvsGPT-5.3-Codexmedium