Navigate
AD
Track all your projects in one dashboard. Get 📊stats, 🔥heatmaps and 👀recordings in one self-hosted dashboard.
uxwizz.com

Muse Glimmer 30B (medium) vs Nemotron 3.5 Super VL (medium)

The average score is effectively tied at 7.7 vs 7.7. Muse Glimmer 30B (medium) has the lower benchmark cost at $0.288 vs $0.437. Muse Glimmer 30B (medium) is faster at 33.97s vs 84.94s, with pass rates of 65.2% vs 72.5%.

Last updated at: 2026-10-16

Compared models

Rank
#138
Total Output Tokens
171,888
Response Time (avg)
33.97s
Total Cost
$0.288
Rank
#134
Total Output Tokens
792,033
Response Time (avg)
84.94s
Total Cost
$0.437
Recommended model Muse Glimmer 30B (medium)

It has the best score here (7.7), while costing about 1.5x less than Nemotron 3.5 Super VL (medium).

Detailed comparison

Metric Muse Glimmer 30B Muse Glimmer 30B medium Release: 2026-08-11 Nemotron 3.5 Super VL Nemotron 3.5 Super VL medium Release: 2026-10-15 Free Available
Score 7.7 7.7
Rank #138 #134
Reliability 10.0 9.8
Consistency 8.0 8.3
Attempts 69/69 69/69
Tests Correct
Attempt pass rate 65.2% 72.5%
Flaky tests 6 5
Total Runs 69 69
Cost per result 2.935 3.118
Total Cost $0.288 $0.437
Input Price $0.300 / 1M $0.150 / 1M
Output Price $1.200 / 1M $0.500 / 1M
Cache Read Price $0.040 / 1M $0.020 / 1M
Cache Write Price N/A N/A
Total Input Tokens 269,497 269,143
Output Tokens 34,935 6,833
Reasoning Tokens 145,752 785,200
Response Time (avg) 33.97s 84.94s
Response Time (max) 181.08s 527.47s
Response Time (total) 781.36s 1953.70s
Parameters 30B 120B total (12B active)
Availability Open source Open source

Cache prices apply to input tokens. Reads reuse cached prompts; writes store them and can cost extra. Output tokens use the output price.

Model generation showcase

Hamster playing table tennis

Prompt: Create a detailed SVG illustration of a hamster playing table tennis.

#138 Muse Glimmer 30B

medium
Cost
$0.003
Time
31.9s
Tokens
1,845 tok

#134 Nemotron 3.5 Super VL

medium
Cost
$0.004
Time
68.1s
Tokens
9,798 tok

Top Models by Score

Score vs Total Cost

Response Time (avg)

Score vs Response Time (avg)

Total Output Tokens

Score vs Total Output Tokens

Category Breakdown

Coding Score Consistency Attempt pass rate Flaky tests Tests Correct Response Time (avg) Input Tokens Output Tokens Reasoning Tokens
Muse Glimmer 30B 8.4 7.8 77.8% 1 33.67s 7,419 4,662 20,605
Nemotron 3.5 Super VL 5.9 7.2 55.6% 1 278.59s 6,261 300 441,080

Switch Comparison Pair