Navigate
AD
Track all your projects in one dashboard. Get 📊stats, 🔥heatmaps and 👀recordings in one self-hosted dashboard.
uxwizz.com

Muse Glimmer 30B (high) vs Nemotron 3.5 Super VL (medium)

The average score is effectively tied at 7.7 vs 7.7. Nemotron 3.5 Super VL (medium) has the lower benchmark cost at $0.437 vs $0.506. Muse Glimmer 30B (high) is faster at 69.87s vs 84.94s, with pass rates of 66.7% vs 72.5%.

Last updated at: 2026-10-16

Compared models

Rank
#133
Total Output Tokens
350,370
Response Time (avg)
69.87s
Total Cost
$0.506
Rank
#134
Total Output Tokens
792,033
Response Time (avg)
84.94s
Total Cost
$0.437
Recommended model Muse Glimmer 30B (high)

It has the strongest score in this comparison (7.7) and the best overall balance of cost and response time across 2 models.

Detailed comparison

Metric Muse Glimmer 30B Muse Glimmer 30B high Release: 2026-08-11 Nemotron 3.5 Super VL Nemotron 3.5 Super VL medium Release: 2026-10-15 Free Available
Score 7.7 7.7
Rank #133 #134
Reliability 10.0 9.8
Consistency 7.3 8.3
Attempts 69/69 69/69
Tests Correct
Attempt pass rate 66.7% 72.5%
Flaky tests 8 5
Total Runs 69 69
Cost per result 5.675 3.118
Total Cost $0.506 $0.437
Input Price $0.300 / 1M $0.150 / 1M
Output Price $1.200 / 1M $0.500 / 1M
Cache Read Price $0.040 / 1M $0.020 / 1M
Cache Write Price N/A N/A
Total Input Tokens 281,859 269,143
Output Tokens 102,526 6,833
Reasoning Tokens 286,217 785,200
Response Time (avg) 69.87s 84.94s
Response Time (max) 451.90s 527.47s
Response Time (total) 1607.12s 1953.70s
Parameters 30B 120B total (12B active)
Availability Open source Open source

Cache prices apply to input tokens. Reads reuse cached prompts; writes store them and can cost extra. Output tokens use the output price.

Model generation showcase

Hamster playing table tennis

Prompt: Create a detailed SVG illustration of a hamster playing table tennis.

#133 Muse Glimmer 30B

high
Cost
$0.005
Time
61.7s
Tokens
3,097 tok

#134 Nemotron 3.5 Super VL

medium
Cost
$0.004
Time
68.1s
Tokens
9,798 tok

Top Models by Score

Score vs Total Cost

Response Time (avg)

Score vs Response Time (avg)

Total Output Tokens

Score vs Total Output Tokens

Category Breakdown

Coding Score Consistency Attempt pass rate Flaky tests Tests Correct Response Time (avg) Input Tokens Output Tokens Reasoning Tokens
Muse Glimmer 30B 8.8 7.8 88.9% 1 95.97s 7,419 16,128 55,433
Nemotron 3.5 Super VL 5.9 7.2 55.6% 1 278.59s 6,261 300 441,080

Switch Comparison Pair