Navigate
AI BENCHY
Advertise here

Muse Glimmer 30B (high) vs Qwen3.7 Plus

Qwen3.7 Plus leads on average score with 7.3 vs 7.2. Qwen3.7 Plus has the lower benchmark cost at $0.106 vs $0.535. Qwen3.7 Plus is faster at 12.11s vs 66.70s, with pass rates of 65.2% vs 54.6%.

Last updated at: 2026-08-14

Rank
#103
Total Output Tokens
370,806
Response Time (avg)
66.70s
Total Cost
$0.535
Rank
#98
Total Output Tokens
58,097
Response Time (avg)
12.11s
Total Cost
$0.106
Recommended model Qwen3.7 Plus

It has the best score here (7.3), while costing about 5.0x less than Muse Glimmer 30B (high).

Detailed comparison

Metric Muse Glimmer 30B Muse Glimmer 30B high Release: 2026-08-11 Qwen3.7 Plus Qwen3.7 Plus none Release: 2026-06-03
Score 7.2 7.3
Rank #103 #98
Reliability 10.0 10.0
Consistency 7.2 10.0
Attempts 66/66 66/66
Tests Correct
Attempt pass rate 65.2% 54.6%
Flaky tests 8 0
Total Runs 66 66
Cost per result 5.349 0.930
Total Cost $0.535 $0.106
Input Price $0.350 / 1M $0.320 / 1M
Output Price $1.500 / 1M $1.280 / 1M
Total Input Tokens 103,494 98,833
Output Tokens 100,589 58,097
Reasoning Tokens 270,217 0
Response Time (avg) 66.70s 12.11s
Response Time (max) 451.90s 206.03s
Response Time (total) 1467.39s 266.40s
Parameters 30B ~397B total (~17B active)
Availability Open source Closed

Model generation showcase

Hamster playing table tennis

Prompt: Create a detailed SVG illustration of a hamster playing table tennis.

#103 Muse Glimmer 30B

high
Cost
$0.005
Time
61.7s
Tokens
3,097 tok

#98 Qwen3.7 Plus

none
Cost
$0.019
Time
213.5s
Tokens
11,960 tok

Top Models by Score

Score vs Total Cost

Response Time (avg)

Score vs Response Time (avg)

Total Output Tokens

Score vs Total Output Tokens

Category Breakdown

Coding Score Consistency Attempt pass rate Flaky tests Tests Correct Response Time (avg) Input Tokens Output Tokens Reasoning Tokens
Muse Glimmer 30B 8.8 7.8 88.9% 1 95.97s 7,419 16,128 55,433
Qwen3.7 Plus 5.5 10.0 33.3% 0 2.15s 7,911 639 0

Quick Compare

Switch Comparison Pair