Navigate
Advertise here

Qwen3.7 Plus vs Grok 4.5 (low)

The average score is effectively tied at 7.8 vs 7.8. Qwen3.7 Plus has the lower benchmark cost at $0.184 vs $1.345. Qwen3.7 Plus is faster at 17.80s vs 18.14s, with pass rates of 56.5% vs 73.9%.

Last updated at: 2026-10-01

Compared models

Rank
#108
Total Output Tokens
76,261
Response Time (avg)
17.80s
Total Cost
$0.184
Rank
#109
Total Output Tokens
121,415
Response Time (avg)
18.14s
Total Cost
$1.345
Recommended model Qwen3.7 Plus

It has the best score here (7.8), while costing about 7.3x less than Grok 4.5 (low).

Detailed comparison

Metric Qwen3.7 Plus Qwen3.7 Plus none Release: 2026-06-03 Grok 4.5 Grok 4.5 low Release: 2026-07-08
Score 7.8 7.8
Rank #108 #109
Reliability 10.0 10.0
Consistency 10.0 9.3
Attempts 69/69 69/69
Tests Correct
Attempt pass rate 56.5% 73.9%
Flaky tests 0 2
Total Runs 69 69
Cost per result 1.410 8.404
Total Cost $0.184 $1.345
Input Price $0.320 / 1M $2.000 / 1M
Output Price $1.280 / 1M $6.000 / 1M
Total Input Tokens 250,495 308,068
Output Tokens 76,261 9,218
Reasoning Tokens 0 112,197
Response Time (avg) 17.80s 18.14s
Response Time (max) 206.03s 205.28s
Response Time (total) 409.51s 417.21s
Parameters ~397B total (~17B active) ~1.7T total (~170B active)
Availability Closed Closed

Model generation showcase

Hamster playing table tennis

Prompt: Create a detailed SVG illustration of a hamster playing table tennis.

#108 Qwen3.7 Plus

none
Cost
$0.019
Time
213.5s
Tokens
11,960 tok

#109 SpaceXAI: Grok 4.5

low
Cost
$0.011
Time
12.4s
Tokens
2,018 tok

Top Models by Score

Score vs Total Cost

Response Time (avg)

Score vs Response Time (avg)

Total Output Tokens

Score vs Total Output Tokens

Category Breakdown

Coding Score Consistency Attempt pass rate Flaky tests Tests Correct Response Time (avg) Input Tokens Output Tokens Reasoning Tokens
Qwen3.7 Plus 5.5 10.0 33.3% 0 2.15s 7,911 639 0
Grok 4.5 10.0 10.0 100.0% 0 13.72s 9,579 303 15,641

Quick Compare

Switch Comparison Pair