Navigate
Advertise here

Qwen3.7 Plus vs Step 3.7 Flash (medium)

The average score is effectively tied at 7.8 vs 7.8. Qwen3.7 Plus has the lower benchmark cost at $0.184 vs $0.571. Qwen3.7 Plus is faster at 17.80s vs 26.57s, with pass rates of 56.5% vs 68.1%.

Last updated at: 2026-10-01

Compared models

Rank
#108
Total Output Tokens
76,261
Response Time (avg)
17.80s
Total Cost
$0.184
Rank
#106
Total Output Tokens
440,835
Response Time (avg)
26.57s
Total Cost
$0.571
Recommended model Qwen3.7 Plus

It has the best score here (7.8), while costing about 3.1x less than Step 3.7 Flash (medium).

Detailed comparison

Metric Qwen3.7 Plus Qwen3.7 Plus none Release: 2026-06-03 Step 3.7 Flash Step 3.7 Flash medium Release: 2026-05-29
Score 7.8 7.8
Rank #108 #106
Reliability 10.0 10.0
Consistency 10.0 8.7
Attempts 69/69 69/69
Tests Correct
Attempt pass rate 56.5% 68.1%
Flaky tests 0 4
Total Runs 69 69
Cost per result 1.410 4.392
Total Cost $0.184 $0.571
Input Price $0.320 / 1M $0.200 / 1M
Output Price $1.280 / 1M $1.150 / 1M
Total Input Tokens 250,495 319,524
Output Tokens 76,261 440,835
Reasoning Tokens 0 0
Response Time (avg) 17.80s 26.57s
Response Time (max) 206.03s 152.83s
Response Time (total) 409.51s 611.09s
Parameters ~397B total (~17B active) 198B total (11B active)
Availability Closed Open source

Model generation showcase

Hamster playing table tennis

Prompt: Create a detailed SVG illustration of a hamster playing table tennis.

#108 Qwen3.7 Plus

none
Cost
$0.019
Time
213.5s
Tokens
11,960 tok

#106 Step 3.7 Flash

medium
Cost
$0.006
Time
46.2s
Tokens
4,466 tok

Top Models by Score

Score vs Total Cost

Response Time (avg)

Score vs Response Time (avg)

Total Output Tokens

Score vs Total Output Tokens

Category Breakdown

Coding Score Consistency Attempt pass rate Flaky tests Tests Correct Response Time (avg) Input Tokens Output Tokens Reasoning Tokens
Qwen3.7 Plus 5.5 10.0 33.3% 0 2.15s 7,911 639 0
Step 3.7 Flash 8.8 7.8 88.9% 1 27.42s 7,437 44,797 0

Quick Compare

Switch Comparison Pair