Navigate
Advertise here

Muse Glimmer 30B (medium) vs Qwen3.7 Flash (low)

The average score is effectively tied at 7.7 vs 7.7. Qwen3.7 Flash (low) has the lower benchmark cost at $0.071 vs $0.288. Muse Glimmer 30B (medium) is faster at 33.97s vs 41.03s, with pass rates of 65.2% vs 68.1%.

Last updated at: 2026-11-10

Compared models

Rank
#168
Total Output Tokens
171,888
Response Time (avg)
33.97s
Total Cost
$0.288
Rank
#167
Total Output Tokens
331,107
Response Time (avg)
41.03s
Total Cost
$0.071
Recommended model Qwen3.7 Flash (low)

It has the best score here (7.7), while costing about 4.1x less than Muse Glimmer 30B (medium).

Detailed comparison

Metric Muse Glimmer 30B Muse Glimmer 30B medium Release: 2026-08-11 Qwen3.7 Flash Qwen3.7 Flash low Release: 2026-07-28
Score 7.7 7.7
Rank #168 #167
Reliability 10.0 10.0
Consistency 8.0 8.1
Attempts 69/69 69/69
Tests Correct
Attempt pass rate 65.2% 68.1%
Flaky tests 6 6
Total Runs 69 69
Cost per result 2.935 0.439
Total Cost $0.288 $0.071
Input Price $0.300 / 1M $0.030 / 1M
Output Price $1.200 / 1M $0.130 / 1M
Cache Read Price $0.040 / 1M $0.006 / 1M
Cache Write Price N/A $0.039 / 1M
Total Input Tokens 269,497 318,058
Output Tokens 34,935 16,035
Reasoning Tokens 145,752 315,072
Response Time (avg) 33.97s 41.03s
Response Time (max) 181.08s 394.54s
Response Time (total) 781.36s 943.75s
Parameters 30B ~35B total (~3B active)
Availability Open source Closed

Cache prices apply to input tokens. Reads reuse cached prompts; writes store them and can cost extra. Output tokens use the output price.

Model generation showcase

Hamster playing table tennis

Prompt: Create a detailed SVG illustration of a hamster playing table tennis.

#168 Muse Glimmer 30B

medium
Cost
$0.003
Time
31.9s
Tokens
1,845 tok

#167 Qwen3.7 Flash

low
Reached the allocated time limit (600 seconds) without receiving showcase output.
Cost
$0.000
Time
600.0s
Tokens
0 tok

Top Models by Score

Score vs Total Cost

Response Time (avg)

Score vs Response Time (avg)

Total Output Tokens

Score vs Total Output Tokens

Category Breakdown

Coding Score Consistency Attempt pass rate Flaky tests Tests Correct Response Time (avg) Input Tokens Output Tokens Reasoning Tokens
Muse Glimmer 30B 8.4 7.8 77.8% 1 33.67s 7,419 4,662 20,605
Qwen3.7 Flash 6.7 7.8 55.6% 1 42.36s 7,893 428 56,419

Quick Compare

Switch Comparison Pair

Claude Haiku 5.5mediumvsQwen3.7 FlashlowNemotron 3.5 Super VLmediumFree AvailablevsQwen3.7 FlashlowMuse Glimmer 30BhighvsQwen3.7 FlashlowGPT-6 LunahighvsQwen3.7 FlashlowMuse WonderhighvsQwen3.7 FlashlowMuse Glimmer 30BmediumvsGPT-6 LunahighMuse WonderxhighvsQwen3.7 FlashlowDeepSeek V4 Flash 0731mediumvsQwen3.7 FlashlowMuse Glimmer 30BmediumvsGrok 4.5lowMuse Glimmer 30BmediumvsQwen3.7 PlusnoneMuse Glimmer 30BmediumvsGPT-6 LunalowMuse Glimmer 30BmediumvsQwen3.8 27BlowFree Available