Navigate
AD
Track all your projects in one dashboard. Get 📊stats, 🔥heatmaps and 👀recordings in one self-hosted dashboard.
uxwizz.com

Muse Glimmer 30B (medium) vs Qwen3.5 Plus 2026-04-20 (medium)

The average score is effectively tied at 7.7 vs 7.7. Muse Glimmer 30B (medium) has the lower benchmark cost at $0.288 vs $0.435. Muse Glimmer 30B (medium) is faster at 33.97s vs 54.06s, with pass rates of 65.2% vs 65.2%.

Last updated at: 2026-11-10

Compared models

Rank
#168
Total Output Tokens
171,888
Response Time (avg)
33.97s
Total Cost
$0.288
Rank
#166
Total Output Tokens
200,348
Response Time (avg)
54.06s
Total Cost
$0.435
Recommended model Muse Glimmer 30B (medium)

It has the best score here (7.7), while costing about 1.5x less than Qwen3.5 Plus 2026-04-20 (medium).

Detailed comparison

Metric Muse Glimmer 30B Muse Glimmer 30B medium Release: 2026-08-11 Qwen3.5 Plus 2026-04-20 Qwen3.5 Plus 2026-04-20 medium Release: 2026-04-20
Score 7.7 7.7
Rank #168 #166
Reliability 10.0 9.7
Consistency 8.0 9.1
Attempts 69/69 69/69
Tests Correct
Attempt pass rate 65.2% 65.2%
Flaky tests 6 2
Total Runs 69 69
Cost per result 2.935 3.481
Total Cost $0.288 $0.435
Input Price $0.300 / 1M $0.300 / 1M
Output Price $1.200 / 1M $1.800 / 1M
Cache Read Price $0.040 / 1M N/A
Cache Write Price N/A $0.375 / 1M
Total Input Tokens 269,497 176,539
Output Tokens 34,935 4,419
Reasoning Tokens 145,752 195,929
Response Time (avg) 33.97s 54.06s
Response Time (max) 181.08s 203.01s
Response Time (total) 781.36s 1189.36s
Parameters 30B ~397B total (~17B active)
Availability Open source Closed

Cache prices apply to input tokens. Reads reuse cached prompts; writes store them and can cost extra. Output tokens use the output price.

Model generation showcase

Hamster playing table tennis

Prompt: Create a detailed SVG illustration of a hamster playing table tennis.

#168 Muse Glimmer 30B

medium
Cost
$0.003
Time
31.9s
Tokens
1,845 tok

#166 Qwen3.5 Plus 2026-04-20

medium
Cost
$0.008
Time
76.7s
Tokens
4,355 tok

Top Models by Score

Score vs Total Cost

Response Time (avg)

Score vs Response Time (avg)

Total Output Tokens

Score vs Total Output Tokens

Category Breakdown

Coding Score Consistency Attempt pass rate Flaky tests Tests Correct Response Time (avg) Input Tokens Output Tokens Reasoning Tokens
Muse Glimmer 30B 8.4 7.8 77.8% 1 33.67s 7,419 4,662 20,605
Qwen3.5 Plus 2026-04-20 6.2 8.7 33.3% 0 125.25s 7,630 308 58,682

Quick Compare

Switch Comparison Pair

Muse Glimmer 30BmediumvsQwen3.7 FlashlowMuse Glimmer 30BhighvsQwen3.5 Plus 2026-04-20mediumGPT-6 LunahighvsQwen3.5 Plus 2026-04-20mediumMuse WonderhighvsQwen3.5 Plus 2026-04-20mediumMuse Glimmer 30BmediumvsGPT-6 LunahighMuse WonderxhighvsQwen3.5 Plus 2026-04-20mediumQwen3.5 Plus 2026-04-20mediumvsGrok 4.5lowMuse Glimmer 30BmediumvsGrok 4.5lowMuse Glimmer 30BmediumvsQwen3.7 PlusnoneMuse Glimmer 30BmediumvsGPT-6 LunalowMuse Glimmer 30BmediumvsQwen3.8 27BlowFree AvailableQwen3.5 Plus 2026-04-20mediumvsGLM 5.3high