#99 Muse Glimmer 30B
low- Cost
- $0.002
- Time
- 13.5s
- Tokens
- 953 tok
Meta
Release: 2026-08-11
Tested on: 2026-08-11 10:05
meta/muse-glimmer-30b::low
Summary
Muse Glimmer 30B scores 7.1 on AI BENCHY and ranks #99. It has 10.0 reliability, a 63.6% pass rate, $0.186 total cost, and 18.51s average response time.
What makes Muse Glimmer 30B unique: It stands out most in Coding, where it ranks #4, while Combined is its weakest area at #16.
7.1
Consistency
8.2
10.0
$0.186
Total Output Tokens
95,478
Total Input Tokens
130,300
Input Price
$0.350 / 1M
Output Price
$1.500 / 1M
Flaky tests
5
Flaky tests had mixed outcomes across runs (at least one pass and one fail).
Hamster playing table tennis
Prompt: Create a detailed SVG illustration of a hamster playing table tennis.
Price History
Historical pricing data for this model from OpenRouter.
| Date | Input Price | Output Price |
|---|---|---|
| 2026-08-11 10:32 | $0.350 / 1M | $1.500 / 1M |
Charts
Choose the first model, then click a second model to open a side-by-side page.
Top Models by Score
Score vs Total Cost
Response Time (avg)
Score vs Response Time (avg)
Total Output Tokens
Score vs Total Output Tokens
Quick Compare
Muse Glimmer 30BlowvsGrok 4.3mediumMuse Glimmer 30BlowvsGLM 5.1mediumMuse Glimmer 30BlowvsQwen3.5-122B-A10BmediumMuse Glimmer 30BlowvsGrok 4.20mediumMuse Glimmer 30BlowvsQwen3.7 PlusnoneMuse Glimmer 30BlowvsDeepSeek V3.2mediumMuse Glimmer 30BlowvsQwen3.5 Plus 2026-04-20mediumMuse Glimmer 30BlowvsKimi K2.5mediumMuse Glimmer 30BlowvsSolar Pro 4highMuse Glimmer 30BlowvsMercury 2medium
Category Breakdown
| Category | Score | Consistency | Tests Correct |
|---|---|---|---|
| Anti-AI Tricks | 8.7 | 8.0 | |
| Coding | 8.1 | 9.9 | |
| Combined | 3.8 | 5.8 | |
| Data parsing and extraction | 10.0 | 10.0 | |
| Domain specific | 3.5 | 4.4 | |
| General Intelligence | 5.0 | 10.0 | |
| Instructions following | 8.4 | 6.9 | |
| Puzzle Solving | 7.7 | 10.0 | |
| Tool Calling | 10.0 | 10.0 | |
| Trivia | 3.0 | 10.0 |