AD
Track all your projects in one dashboard. Get 📊stats, 🔥heatmaps and 👀recordings in one self-hosted dashboard.
uxwizz.com
#220

Muse Glimmer 30B

Meta Release: 2026-08-11 Tested on: 2026-10-01 03:11 meta/muse-glimmer-30b::low
30BDenseOpen source
(xhigh) (high) (medium) (low)

Summary

Muse Glimmer 30B scores 6.9 on AI BENCHY and ranks #220. It has 10.0 reliability, a 63.8% pass rate, $0.219 total cost, and 22.40s average response time.

What makes Muse Glimmer 30B unique: It stands out most in Coding, where it ranks #4, while Combined is its weakest area at #13.

Model facts

Researched on 2026-08-12

Reported
Parameters
30B
Architecture
Dense
Availability
Open source
License
Apache-2.0
Parameter source Availability source

Score

6.9

Consistency

8.0

Reliability

10.0

Total Cost (Current Price)

$0.219 ↓ -17.7%

Tested at: $0.266

Total Output Tokens

105,320

Total Input Tokens

307,228

Input Price

$0.300 / 1M

Output Price

$1.200 / 1M

Cache Read Price

$0.040 / 1M

Cache Write Price

N/A

Cache prices apply to input tokens. Reads reuse cached prompts; writes store them and can cost extra. Output tokens use the output price.

Tests Correct

Wrong Tests: 12

Attempt pass rate: 63.8%

Flaky tests

6

Flaky tests had mixed outcomes across runs (at least one pass and one fail).

Response Time (avg)

22.40s

Response Time (max): 234.92s

Response Time (total): 515.14s

Wrong answer: 6 Did not follow instructions: 3 Invalid tool call: 2 No answer: 1

Hamster playing table tennis

Prompt: Create a detailed SVG illustration of a hamster playing table tennis.

#220 Muse Glimmer 30B

low
Cost
$0.002
Time
13.5s
Tokens
953 tok

Run history

Tested on Score Reliability Tests Correct Total Cost Compare
2026-10-01 03:11 Re-test 6.9 10.0 $0.219 ↓ Current run
2026-08-11 10:05 Initial run 7.1 10.0 $0.186 Compare

This run used a different benchmark suite. Keep suite changes in mind when reading historical movement.

Run comparison

RunBenchmark coverageScoreConsistencyReliabilityTests CorrectFlaky testsTotal Output TokensTotal Input TokensTotal CostResponse Time (avg)
2026-10-01 03:11 · Current run69/69 attempts6.98.010.011/236105,320307,228$0.21922.40s
2026-08-11 10:05 · Initial run66/66 attempts7.18.210.011/22595,478130,300$0.18618.51s
Difference—-0.2-0.20.00+1+9842+176928+$0.034+3887ms

Benchmark coverage differs: 69/69 attempts (Target: 3 repeats per test) versus 66/66 attempts (Target: 3 repeats per test). Totals and repeat-sensitive metrics are not directly comparable.

These two runs used different benchmark suites, so the deltas reflect both model changes and suite changes.

Price History

Historical pricing data for this model from OpenRouter.

Date Input Price Output Price Cache Read Price Cache Write Price
2026-08-14 12:51 $0.350 / 1M $1.500 / 1M N/A N/A
2026-10-06 14:54 $0.300 / 1M $1.200 / 1M $0.040 / 1M N/A

Charts

Choose the first model, then click a second model to open a side-by-side page.

Total Output Tokens

Score vs Total Output Tokens

Quick Compare

Muse Glimmer 30BlowvsGemini 3 Flash PreviewlowMuse Glimmer 30BlowvsMinimax M3.1 FlashmaxFree AvailableMuse Glimmer 30BlowvsGrok 4.6lowMuse Glimmer 30BlowvsGemini 3.1 Flash LitemediumMuse Glimmer 30BlowvsQwen3.5-122B-A10BmediumMuse Glimmer 30BlowvsEmber-1highMuse Glimmer 30BlowvsStep 5 PreviewhighMuse Glimmer 30BlowvsGemma 4 31BmediumFree AvailableMuse Glimmer 30BlowvsEmber-1lowMuse Glimmer 30BlowvsGPT-5.6 Lunalow

Category Breakdown

Category Score Consistency Tests Correct
Agentic 6.1 3.1
Anti-AI Tricks 8.7 8.0
Coding 8.1 9.9
Combined 3.8 5.8
Data parsing and extraction 10.0 10.0
Domain specific 3.5 4.4
General Intelligence 5.0 10.0
Instructions following 8.4 6.9
Puzzle Solving 7.7 10.0
Tool Calling 10.0 10.0
Trivia 3.0 10.0

Compared models