#53 KAT-Coder-Pro V2.5
high- Cost
- $0.009
- Time
- 26.4s
- Tokens
- 3,117 tok
AI BENCHY Compare
Summary
Qwen3.5-122B-A10B (medium) leads on average score with 7.7 vs 7.7. KAT-Coder-Pro V2.5 (high) has the lower benchmark cost at $0.246 vs $0.588. KAT-Coder-Pro V2.5 (high) is faster at 12.30s vs 42.49s, with pass rates of 63.5% vs 73.0%.
Last updated at: 2026-07-14
| Metric | KAT-Coder-Pro V2.5 KAT-Coder-Pro V2.5 high | Qwen3.5-122B-A10B Qwen3.5-122B-A10B medium |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 7.7 | 7.7 |
| Rank | #53 | #46 |
| Reliability | 10.0 | 10.0 |
| Consistency | 8.1 | 8.8 |
| Tests Correct | ||
| Attempt pass rate | 63.5% | 73.0% |
| Flaky tests | 5 | 3 |
| Total Runs | 63 | 63 |
| Cost per result | 2.228 | 5.235 |
| Total Cost | $0.246 | $0.588 |
| Input Price | $0.740 / 1M | $0.260 / 1M |
| Output Price | $2.960 / 1M | $2.080 / 1M |
| Total Input Tokens | 42,750 | 41,832 |
| Output Tokens | 2,509 | 26,187 |
| Reasoning Tokens | 69,594 | 251,028 |
| Response Time (avg) | 12.30s | 42.49s |
| Response Time (max) | 95.65s | 168.16s |
| Response Time (total) | 258.34s | 892.30s |
Generation showcase
Prompt: Create a detailed SVG illustration of a hamster playing table tennis.
| Coding | Score | Consistency | Attempt pass rate | Flaky tests | Tests Correct | Response Time (avg) | Input Tokens | Output Tokens | Reasoning Tokens |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| KAT-Coder-Pro V2.5 | 6.4 | 7.9 | 44.4% | 1 | 22.00s | 7,893 | 422 | 20,461 | |
| Qwen3.5-122B-A10B | 6.0 | 7.2 | 55.6% | 1 | 114.48s | 7,630 | 8,057 | 82,578 |
Switch Comparison Pair