Navigate
AI BENCHY
Advertise here

AI BENCHY Compare

Qwen: Qwen3.5-122B-A10B vs StepFun: Step 3.7 Flash

Summary

The average score is effectively tied at 7.7 vs 7.7. Step 3.7 Flash (low) has the lower benchmark cost at $0.341 vs $0.588. Step 3.7 Flash (low) is faster at 15.74s vs 42.49s, with pass rates of 73.0% vs 68.3%.

Recommended modelStep 3.7 Flash (low)It has the best score here (7.7), while costing about 1.7x less than Qwen3.5-122B-A10B (medium).

Last updated at: 2026-07-14

Metric Qwen3.5-122B-A10B Qwen3.5-122B-A10B medium Release: 2026-02-24 Step 3.7 Flash Step 3.7 Flash low Release: 2026-05-29
Score 7.7 7.7
Rank #46 #51
Reliability 10.0 10.0
Consistency 8.8 8.4
Tests Correct
Attempt pass rate 73.0% 68.3%
Flaky tests 3 4
Total Runs 63 63
Cost per result 5.235 2.840
Total Cost $0.588 $0.341
Input Price $0.260 / 1M $0.200 / 1M
Output Price $2.080 / 1M $1.150 / 1M
Total Input Tokens 41,832 40,101
Output Tokens 26,187 289,325
Reasoning Tokens 251,028 0
Response Time (avg) 42.49s 15.74s
Response Time (max) 168.16s 124.75s
Response Time (total) 892.30s 330.63s

Generation showcase

Hamster playing table tennis

Prompt: Create a detailed SVG illustration of a hamster playing table tennis.

#46 Qwen3.5-122B-A10B

medium
Cost
$0.019
Time
48.7s
Tokens
6,034 tok

#51 Step 3.7 Flash

low
Invalid SVG
Cost
$0.004
Time
25.3s
Tokens
3,072 tok

Top Models by Score

Score vs Total Cost

Response Time (avg)

Score vs Response Time (avg)

Total Output Tokens

Score vs Total Output Tokens

Category Breakdown

Coding Score Consistency Attempt pass rate Flaky tests Tests Correct Response Time (avg) Input Tokens Output Tokens Reasoning Tokens
Qwen3.5-122B-A10B 6.0 7.2 55.6% 1 114.48s 7,630 8,057 82,578
Step 3.7 Flash 8.2 7.2 88.9% 1 9.46s 7,437 18,685 0

Quick Compare

Switch Comparison Pair