Navigate
AD
Track all your projects in one dashboard. Get 📊stats, 🔥heatmaps and 👀recordings in one self-hosted dashboard.
uxwizz.com

Minimax M3.1 Flash (max) vs Qwen3.5-122B-A10B (medium)

The average score is effectively tied at 6.9 vs 7.0. Minimax M3.1 Flash (max) has the lower benchmark cost at $0.000 vs $1.152. Minimax M3.1 Flash (max) is faster at 40.94s vs 66.96s, with pass rates of 59.4% vs 71.0%.

Last updated at: 2026-10-19

Compared models

Rank
#194
Total Output Tokens
311,683
Response Time (avg)
40.94s
Total Cost
$0.000
Rank
#190
Total Output Tokens
522,190
Response Time (avg)
66.96s
Total Cost
$1.152
Recommended model Qwen3.5-122B-A10B (medium)

It has the strongest score in this comparison (7.0) and the best overall balance of cost and response time across 2 models.

Detailed comparison

Metric Minimax M3.1 Flash Minimax M3.1 Flash max Release: 2026-10-19 Free Available Qwen3.5-122B-A10B Qwen3.5-122B-A10B medium Release: 2026-02-24
Score 6.9 7.0
Rank #194 #190
Reliability 10.0 10.0
Consistency 8.0 8.3
Attempts 69/69 69/69
Tests Correct
Attempt pass rate 59.4% 71.0%
Flaky tests 6 5
Total Runs 69 69
Cost per result 0.000 9.196
Total Cost $0.000 $1.152
Input Price $0.000 / 1M $0.260 / 1M
Output Price $0.000 / 1M $2.080 / 1M
Cache Read Price N/A N/A
Cache Write Price N/A N/A
Total Input Tokens 398,523 251,695
Output Tokens 7,992 49,415
Reasoning Tokens 303,691 472,775
Response Time (avg) 40.94s 66.96s
Response Time (max) 256.57s 519.30s
Response Time (total) 941.68s 1539.99s
Parameters - 122B total (10B active)
Availability Closed Open source

Cache prices apply to input tokens. Reads reuse cached prompts; writes store them and can cost extra. Output tokens use the output price.

Model generation showcase

Hamster playing table tennis

Prompt: Create a detailed SVG illustration of a hamster playing table tennis.

#194 Minimax M3.1 Flash

max
Cost
$0.000
Time
174.6s
Tokens
20,628 tok

#190 Qwen3.5-122B-A10B

medium
Cost
$0.019
Time
48.7s
Tokens
6,034 tok

Top Models by Score

Score vs Total Cost

Response Time (avg)

Score vs Response Time (avg)

Total Output Tokens

Score vs Total Output Tokens

Category Breakdown

Coding Score Consistency Attempt pass rate Flaky tests Tests Correct Response Time (avg) Input Tokens Output Tokens Reasoning Tokens
Minimax M3.1 Flash 10.0 10.0 100.0% 0 25.67s 9,024 340 27,539
Qwen3.5-122B-A10B 6.0 7.2 55.6% 1 114.48s 7,630 8,057 82,578

Quick Compare

Switch Comparison Pair

Qwen3.5-122B-A10BmediumvsGrok 4.6lowMuse Glimmer 30BlowvsMinimax M3.1 FlashmaxFree AvailableGemini 3 Flash PreviewlowvsQwen3.5-122B-A10BmediumQwen3.5-122B-A10BmediumvsStep 5 PreviewhighGemini 3 Flash PreviewlowvsMinimax M3.1 FlashmaxFree AvailableMuse Glimmer 30BlowvsQwen3.5-122B-A10BmediumMinimax M3.1 FlashmaxFree AvailablevsGrok 4.6lowEmber-1lowvsQwen3.5-122B-A10BmediumMinimax M3.1 FlashmaxFree AvailablevsStep 5 PreviewhighEmber-1lowvsMinimax M3.1 FlashmaxFree AvailableGemini 3.1 Flash LitemediumvsMinimax M3.1 FlashmaxFree AvailableEmber-1highvsMinimax M3.1 FlashmaxFree Available