Navigate
AI BENCHY
AD
Track all your projects in one dashboard. Get 📊stats, 🔥heatmaps and 👀recordings in one self-hosted dashboard.
uxwizz.com

Qwen: Qwen3.7 Plus vs StepFun: Step 3.7 Flash

Step 3.7 Flash (low) leads on average score with 7.3 vs 7.2. Qwen3.7 Plus has the lower benchmark cost at $0.106 vs $0.454. Qwen3.7 Plus is faster at 12.09s vs 20.68s, with pass rates of 50.0% vs 68.2%.

Recommended modelQwen3.7 PlusIts score stays close to the best score here (7.2 vs 7.3), while costing about 4.3x less than Step 3.7 Flash (low).

Last updated at: 2026-07-17

Metric Qwen3.7 Plus Qwen3.7 Plus none Release: 2026-06-03 Step 3.7 Flash Step 3.7 Flash low Release: 2026-05-29
Score 7.2 7.3
Rank #68 #64
Reliability 10.0 10.0
Consistency 10.0 8.1
Tests Correct
Attempt pass rate 50.0% 68.2%
Flaky tests 0 5
Total Runs 66 66
Cost per result 1.014 3.782
Total Cost $0.106 $0.454
Input Price $0.320 / 1M $0.200 / 1M
Output Price $1.280 / 1M $1.150 / 1M
Total Input Tokens 98,824 103,833
Output Tokens 58,097 376,581
Reasoning Tokens 0 0
Response Time (avg) 12.09s 20.68s
Response Time (max) 206.03s 124.75s
Response Time (total) 265.89s 455.01s

Hamster playing table tennis

Prompt: Create a detailed SVG illustration of a hamster playing table tennis.

#68 Qwen3.7 Plus

none
Cost
$0.019
Time
213.5s
Tokens
11,960 tok

#64 Step 3.7 Flash

low
Invalid SVG
Cost
$0.004
Time
25.3s
Tokens
3,072 tok

Top Models by Score

Score vs Total Cost

Response Time (avg)

Score vs Response Time (avg)

Total Output Tokens

Score vs Total Output Tokens

Category Breakdown

Coding Score Consistency Attempt pass rate Flaky tests Tests Correct Response Time (avg) Input Tokens Output Tokens Reasoning Tokens
Qwen3.7 Plus 5.5 10.0 33.3% 0 2.15s 7,911 639 0
Step 3.7 Flash 8.2 7.2 88.9% 1 9.46s 7,437 18,685 0

Quick Compare

Switch Comparison Pair