Navigate
AI BENCHY
Advertise here

Qwen: Qwen3.5 Plus 2026-04-20 vs StepFun: Step 3.7 Flash

Step 3.7 Flash (low) leads on average score with 7.3 vs 7.2. Qwen3.5 Plus 2026-04-20 (medium) has the lower benchmark cost at $0.317 vs $0.454. Step 3.7 Flash (low) is faster at 20.68s vs 46.36s, with pass rates of 63.6% vs 68.2%.

Recommended modelStep 3.7 Flash (low)It has the best score here (7.3), while responding about 2.2x faster than Qwen3.5 Plus 2026-04-20 (medium).

Last updated at: 2026-07-20

Metric Qwen3.5 Plus 2026-04-20 Qwen3.5 Plus 2026-04-20 medium Release: 2026-04-20 Step 3.7 Flash Step 3.7 Flash low Release: 2026-05-29
Score 7.2 7.3
Rank #70 #67
Reliability 9.6 10.0
Consistency 9.0 8.1
Tests Correct
Attempt pass rate 63.6% 68.2%
Flaky tests 2 5
Total Runs 66 66
Cost per result 3.023 3.782
Total Cost $0.317 $0.454
Input Price $0.300 / 1M $0.200 / 1M
Output Price $1.800 / 1M $1.150 / 1M
Total Input Tokens 42,097 103,833
Output Tokens 2,280 376,581
Reasoning Tokens 166,613 0
Response Time (avg) 46.36s 20.68s
Response Time (max) 189.38s 124.75s
Response Time (total) 973.57s 455.01s

Hamster playing table tennis

Prompt: Create a detailed SVG illustration of a hamster playing table tennis.

#70 Qwen3.5 Plus 2026-04-20

medium
Cost
$0.008
Time
76.7s
Tokens
4,355 tok

#67 Step 3.7 Flash

low
Invalid SVG
Cost
$0.004
Time
25.3s
Tokens
3,072 tok

Top Models by Score

Score vs Total Cost

Response Time (avg)

Score vs Response Time (avg)

Total Output Tokens

Score vs Total Output Tokens

Category Breakdown

Coding Score Consistency Attempt pass rate Flaky tests Tests Correct Response Time (avg) Input Tokens Output Tokens Reasoning Tokens
Qwen3.5 Plus 2026-04-20 6.2 8.7 33.3% 0 125.25s 7,630 308 58,682
Step 3.7 Flash 8.2 7.2 88.9% 1 9.46s 7,437 18,685 0

Quick Compare

Switch Comparison Pair