Navigate
AI BENCHY
AD
Track all your projects in one dashboard. Get 📊stats, 🔥heatmaps and 👀recordings in one self-hosted dashboard.
uxwizz.com

Anthropic: Claude Sonnet 4.6 vs StepFun: Step 3.7 Flash

Claude Sonnet 4.6 leads on average score with 7.3 vs 7.3. Step 3.7 Flash (low) has the lower benchmark cost at $0.454 vs $0.661. Claude Sonnet 4.6 is faster at 8.12s vs 20.68s, with pass rates of 57.6% vs 68.2%.

Recommended modelClaude Sonnet 4.6It has the best score here (7.3), while responding about 2.5x faster than Step 3.7 Flash (low).

Last updated at: 2026-07-17

Metric Claude Sonnet 4.6 Claude Sonnet 4.6 none Release: 2026-02-17 Step 3.7 Flash Step 3.7 Flash low Release: 2026-05-29
Score 7.3 7.3
Rank #60 #64
Reliability 10.0 10.0
Consistency 9.7 8.1
Tests Correct
Attempt pass rate 57.6% 68.2%
Flaky tests 1 5
Total Runs 66 66
Cost per result 5.502 3.782
Total Cost $0.661 $0.454
Input Price $3.000 / 1M $0.200 / 1M
Output Price $15.000 / 1M $1.150 / 1M
Total Input Tokens 123,264 103,833
Output Tokens 19,362 376,581
Reasoning Tokens 0 0
Response Time (avg) 8.12s 20.68s
Response Time (max) 51.18s 124.75s
Response Time (total) 121.78s 455.01s

Hamster playing table tennis

Prompt: Create a detailed SVG illustration of a hamster playing table tennis.

#60 Claude Sonnet 4.6

none
Cost
$0.038
Time
27.3s
Tokens
2,598 tok

#64 Step 3.7 Flash

low
Invalid SVG
Cost
$0.004
Time
25.3s
Tokens
3,072 tok

Top Models by Score

Score vs Total Cost

Response Time (avg)

Score vs Response Time (avg)

Total Output Tokens

Score vs Total Output Tokens

Category Breakdown

Coding Score Consistency Attempt pass rate Flaky tests Tests Correct Response Time (avg) Input Tokens Output Tokens Reasoning Tokens
Claude Sonnet 4.6 5.5 10.0 33.3% 0 5.19s 8,522 2,127 0
Step 3.7 Flash 8.2 7.2 88.9% 1 9.46s 7,437 18,685 0

Quick Compare

Switch Comparison Pair