Navigate
AI BENCHY
Advertise here

Claude Sonnet 4.6 vs Qwen3.5-27B (medium)

Qwen3.5-27B (medium) leads on average score with 7.4 vs 7.3. Claude Sonnet 4.6 has the lower benchmark cost at $0.661 vs $0.981. Claude Sonnet 4.6 is faster at 8.12s vs 111.94s, with pass rates of 57.6% vs 72.7%.

Last updated at: 2026-08-01

Rank
#76
Total Output Tokens
19,362
Response Time (avg)
8.12s
Total Cost
$0.661
Rank
#71
Total Output Tokens
614,429
Response Time (avg)
111.94s
Total Cost
$0.981
Recommended model Claude Sonnet 4.6

Its score stays close to the best score here (7.3 vs 7.4), while responding about 13.8x faster than Qwen3.5-27B (medium).

Detailed comparison

Metric Claude Sonnet 4.6 Claude Sonnet 4.6 none Release: 2026-02-17 Qwen3.5-27B Qwen3.5-27B medium Release: 2026-02-24
Score 7.3 7.4
Rank #76 #71
Reliability 10.0 10.0
Consistency 9.7 8.2
Tests Correct
Attempt pass rate 57.6% 72.7%
Flaky tests 1 5
Total Runs 66 66
Cost per result 5.502 8.324
Total Cost $0.661 $0.981
Input Price $3.000 / 1M $0.195 / 1M
Output Price $15.000 / 1M $1.560 / 1M
Total Input Tokens 123,264 111,635
Output Tokens 19,362 15,999
Reasoning Tokens 0 598,430
Response Time (avg) 8.12s 111.94s
Response Time (max) 51.18s 1026.43s
Response Time (total) 121.78s 2462.67s

Model generation showcase

Hamster playing table tennis

Prompt: Create a detailed SVG illustration of a hamster playing table tennis.

#76 Claude Sonnet 4.6

none
Cost
$0.038
Time
27.3s
Tokens
2,598 tok

#71 Qwen3.5-27B

medium
Cost
$0.008
Time
62.0s
Tokens
3,099 tok

Top Models by Score

Score vs Total Cost

Response Time (avg)

Score vs Response Time (avg)

Total Output Tokens

Score vs Total Output Tokens

Category Breakdown

Coding Score Consistency Attempt pass rate Flaky tests Tests Correct Response Time (avg) Input Tokens Output Tokens Reasoning Tokens
Claude Sonnet 4.6 5.5 10.0 33.3% 0 5.19s 8,522 2,127 0
Qwen3.5-27B 6.2 7.1 55.6% 1 160.69s 7,895 6,381 89,388

Quick Compare

Switch Comparison Pair