Navigate
AI BENCHY
Advertise here

Claude Sonnet 4.6 vs Qwen3.7 Flash (low)

Claude Sonnet 4.6 leads on average score with 7.3 vs 7.3. Qwen3.7 Flash (low) has the lower benchmark cost at $0.042 vs $0.661. Claude Sonnet 4.6 is faster at 8.12s vs 36.80s, with pass rates of 57.6% vs 68.2%.

Last updated at: 2026-07-28

Rank
#72
Total Output Tokens
19,362
Response Time (avg)
8.12s
Total Cost
$0.661
Rank
#75
Total Output Tokens
297,249
Response Time (avg)
36.80s
Total Cost
$0.042
Recommended model Qwen3.7 Flash (low)

Its score stays close to the best score here (7.3 vs 7.3), while costing about 15.9x less than Claude Sonnet 4.6.

Detailed comparison

Metric Claude Sonnet 4.6 Claude Sonnet 4.6 none Release: 2026-02-17 Qwen3.7 Flash Qwen3.7 Flash low Release: 2026-07-28
Score 7.3 7.3
Rank #72 #75
Reliability 10.0 9.9
Consistency 9.7 8.4
Tests Correct
Attempt pass rate 57.6% 68.2%
Flaky tests 1 5
Total Runs 66 66
Cost per result 5.502 0.346
Total Cost $0.661 $0.042
Input Price $3.000 / 1M $0.030 / 1M
Output Price $15.000 / 1M $0.130 / 1M
Total Input Tokens 123,264 92,182
Output Tokens 19,362 14,287
Reasoning Tokens 0 282,962
Response Time (avg) 8.12s 36.80s
Response Time (max) 51.18s 394.54s
Response Time (total) 121.78s 809.54s

Hamster playing table tennis

Prompt: Create a detailed SVG illustration of a hamster playing table tennis.

#72 Claude Sonnet 4.6

none
Cost
$0.038
Time
27.3s
Tokens
2,598 tok

#75 Qwen3.7 Flash

low
Invalid SVG
Cost
$0.000
Time
600.0s
Tokens
0 tok

Top Models by Score

Score vs Total Cost

Response Time (avg)

Score vs Response Time (avg)

Total Output Tokens

Score vs Total Output Tokens

Category Breakdown

Coding Score Consistency Attempt pass rate Flaky tests Tests Correct Response Time (avg) Input Tokens Output Tokens Reasoning Tokens
Claude Sonnet 4.6 5.5 10.0 33.3% 0 5.19s 8,522 2,127 0
Qwen3.7 Flash 6.7 7.8 55.6% 1 42.36s 7,893 428 56,419

Quick Compare

Switch Comparison Pair