Navigate
AI BENCHY
AD
Track all your projects in one dashboard. Get 📊stats, 🔥heatmaps and 👀recordings in one self-hosted dashboard.
uxwizz.com

Anthropic: Claude Sonnet 4.6 vs Meituan: LongCat 2.0

LongCat 2.0 (medium) leads on average score with 7.4 vs 7.3. LongCat 2.0 (medium) has the lower benchmark cost at $0.478 vs $0.661. Claude Sonnet 4.6 is faster at 8.12s vs 136.64s, with pass rates of 57.6% vs 60.6%.

Recommended modelClaude Sonnet 4.6Its score stays close to the best score here (7.3 vs 7.4), while responding about 16.8x faster than LongCat 2.0 (medium).

Last updated at: 2026-07-20

Metric Claude Sonnet 4.6 Claude Sonnet 4.6 none Release: 2026-02-17 LongCat 2.0 LongCat 2.0 medium Release: 2026-07-20
Score 7.3 7.4
Rank #63 #60
Reliability 10.0 9.8
Consistency 9.7 8.9
Tests Correct
Attempt pass rate 57.6% 60.6%
Flaky tests 1 3
Total Runs 66 66
Cost per result 5.502 3.978
Total Cost $0.661 $0.478
Input Price $3.000 / 1M $0.300 / 1M
Output Price $15.000 / 1M $1.200 / 1M
Total Input Tokens 123,264 97,315
Output Tokens 19,362 44,384
Reasoning Tokens 0 329,012
Response Time (avg) 8.12s 136.64s
Response Time (max) 51.18s 939.52s
Response Time (total) 121.78s 3006.01s

Hamster playing table tennis

Prompt: Create a detailed SVG illustration of a hamster playing table tennis.

#63 Claude Sonnet 4.6

none
Cost
$0.038
Time
27.3s
Tokens
2,598 tok

#60 LongCat 2.0

medium
Cost
$0.016
Time
285.1s
Tokens
13,057 tok

Top Models by Score

Score vs Total Cost

Response Time (avg)

Score vs Response Time (avg)

Total Output Tokens

Score vs Total Output Tokens

Category Breakdown

Coding Score Consistency Attempt pass rate Flaky tests Tests Correct Response Time (avg) Input Tokens Output Tokens Reasoning Tokens
Claude Sonnet 4.6 5.5 10.0 33.3% 0 5.19s 8,522 2,127 0
LongCat 2.0 10.0 10.0 100.0% 0 455.00s 7,419 533 214,143

Quick Compare

Switch Comparison Pair