Navigate
AI BENCHY
Advertise here

Claude Sonnet 4.6 vs GLM 5.3 (high)

The average score is effectively tied at 7.3 vs 7.3. GLM 5.3 (high) has the lower benchmark cost at $0.403 vs $0.661. Claude Sonnet 4.6 is faster at 7.67s vs 27.82s, with pass rates of 57.6% vs 74.2%.

Last updated at: 2026-08-20

Rank
#98
Total Output Tokens
19,362
Response Time (avg)
7.67s
Total Cost
$0.661
Rank
#99
Total Output Tokens
63,667
Response Time (avg)
27.82s
Total Cost
$0.403
Recommended model Claude Sonnet 4.6

It has the best score here (7.3), while responding about 3.6x faster than GLM 5.3 (high).

Detailed comparison

Metric Claude Sonnet 4.6 Claude Sonnet 4.6 none Release: 2026-02-17 GLM 5.3 GLM 5.3 high Release: 2026-08-20
Score 7.3 7.3
Rank #98 #99
Reliability 10.0 10.0
Consistency 9.7 7.5
Attempts 66/66 66/66
Tests Correct
Attempt pass rate 57.6% 74.2%
Flaky tests 1 7
Total Runs 66 66
Cost per result 5.503 3.099
Total Cost $0.661 $0.403
Input Price $3.000 / 1M $1.400 / 1M
Output Price $15.000 / 1M $4.400 / 1M
Total Input Tokens 123,273 87,601
Output Tokens 19,362 6,006
Reasoning Tokens 0 57,661
Response Time (avg) 7.67s 27.82s
Response Time (max) 51.18s 159.91s
Response Time (total) 122.78s 612.06s
Parameters ~1T total (~100B active) 744B total (40B active)
Availability Closed Closed

Model generation showcase

Hamster playing table tennis

Prompt: Create a detailed SVG illustration of a hamster playing table tennis.

#98 Claude Sonnet 4.6

none
Cost
$0.038
Time
27.3s
Tokens
2,598 tok

#99 GLM 5.3

high
Cost
$0.085
Time
362.5s
Tokens
19,310 tok

Top Models by Score

Score vs Total Cost

Response Time (avg)

Score vs Response Time (avg)

Total Output Tokens

Score vs Total Output Tokens

Category Breakdown

Coding Score Consistency Attempt pass rate Flaky tests Tests Correct Response Time (avg) Input Tokens Output Tokens Reasoning Tokens
Claude Sonnet 4.6 5.5 10.0 33.3% 0 5.19s 8,522 2,127 0
GLM 5.3 6.6 5.0 66.7% 2 18.89s 7,317 473 8,190

Quick Compare

Switch Comparison Pair