Navigate
AI BENCHY
AD
Track all your projects in one dashboard. Get 📊stats, 🔥heatmaps and 👀recordings in one self-hosted dashboard.
uxwizz.com

Google: Gemini 3 Flash Preview vs Qwen: Qwen3.5-27B

Qwen3.5-27B (medium) leads on average score with 7.4 vs 7.4. Gemini 3 Flash Preview (low) has the lower benchmark cost at $0.177 vs $0.981. Gemini 3 Flash Preview (low) is faster at 6.28s vs 111.94s, with pass rates of 75.8% vs 72.7%.

Recommended modelGemini 3 Flash Preview (low)Its score stays close to the best score here (7.4 vs 7.4), while costing about 5.6x less than Qwen3.5-27B (medium).

Last updated at: 2026-07-17

Metric Gemini 3 Flash Preview Gemini 3 Flash Preview low Release: 2025-12-17 Qwen3.5-27B Qwen3.5-27B medium Release: 2026-02-24
Score 7.4 7.4
Rank #58 #56
Reliability 10.0 10.0
Consistency 9.2 8.2
Tests Correct
Attempt pass rate 75.8% 72.7%
Flaky tests 2 5
Total Runs 66 66
Cost per result 1.101 8.324
Total Cost $0.177 $0.981
Input Price $0.500 / 1M $0.195 / 1M
Output Price $3.000 / 1M $1.560 / 1M
Total Input Tokens 123,684 111,635
Output Tokens 9,572 15,999
Reasoning Tokens 28,518 598,430
Response Time (avg) 6.28s 111.94s
Response Time (max) 17.13s 1026.43s
Response Time (total) 138.06s 2462.67s

Hamster playing table tennis

Prompt: Create a detailed SVG illustration of a hamster playing table tennis.

#58 Gemini 3 Flash Preview

low
Cost
$0.007
Time
12.1s
Tokens
2,289 tok

#56 Qwen3.5-27B

medium
Cost
$0.008
Time
62.0s
Tokens
3,099 tok

Top Models by Score

Score vs Total Cost

Response Time (avg)

Score vs Response Time (avg)

Total Output Tokens

Score vs Total Output Tokens

Category Breakdown

Coding Score Consistency Attempt pass rate Flaky tests Tests Correct Response Time (avg) Input Tokens Output Tokens Reasoning Tokens
Gemini 3 Flash Preview 5.8 7.2 44.4% 1 6.00s 8,122 456 7,421
Qwen3.5-27B 6.2 7.1 55.6% 1 160.69s 7,895 6,381 89,388

Quick Compare

Switch Comparison Pair