Navigate
AD
Track all your projects in one dashboard. Get 📊stats, 🔥heatmaps and 👀recordings in one self-hosted dashboard.
uxwizz.com

Claude Opus 5 vs Qwen3.5-27B (medium)

Claude Opus 5 leads on average score with 7.5 vs 7.5. Qwen3.5-27B (medium) has the lower benchmark cost at $0.982 vs $1.550. Claude Opus 5 is faster at 7.65s vs 113.28s, with pass rates of 57.6% vs 75.8%.

Last updated at: 2026-09-07

Compared models

Rank
#97
Total Output Tokens
24,866
Response Time (avg)
7.65s
Total Cost
$1.550
Rank
#103
Total Output Tokens
614,909
Response Time (avg)
113.28s
Total Cost
$0.982
Recommended model Claude Opus 5

It has the best score here (7.5), while responding about 14.8x faster than Qwen3.5-27B (medium).

Detailed comparison

Metric Claude Opus 5 Claude Opus 5 none Release: 2026-07-25 Qwen3.5-27B Qwen3.5-27B medium Release: 2026-02-24
Score 7.5 7.5
Rank #97 #103
Reliability 10.0 10.0
Consistency 9.6 7.8
Attempts 66/66 66/66
Tests Correct
Attempt pass rate 57.6% 75.8%
Flaky tests 1 6
Total Runs 66 66
Cost per result 12.912 8.217
Total Cost $1.550 $0.982
Input Price $5.000 / 1M $0.195 / 1M
Output Price $25.000 / 1M $1.560 / 1M
Total Input Tokens 185,547 111,644
Output Tokens 24,866 16,113
Reasoning Tokens 0 598,796
Response Time (avg) 7.65s 113.28s
Response Time (max) 47.72s 1026.43s
Response Time (total) 168.35s 2492.26s
Parameters ~5T total (~500B active) 27B
Availability Closed Open source

Model generation showcase

Hamster playing table tennis

Prompt: Create a detailed SVG illustration of a hamster playing table tennis.

#97 Claude Opus 5

none
Cost
$0.271
Time
149.3s
Tokens
10,962 tok

#103 Qwen3.5-27B

medium
Cost
$0.008
Time
62.0s
Tokens
3,099 tok

Top Models by Score

Score vs Total Cost

Response Time (avg)

Score vs Response Time (avg)

Total Output Tokens

Score vs Total Output Tokens

Category Breakdown

Coding Score Consistency Attempt pass rate Flaky tests Tests Correct Response Time (avg) Input Tokens Output Tokens Reasoning Tokens
Claude Opus 5 5.9 9.7 33.3% 0 5.54s 10,590 2,886 0
Qwen3.5-27B 6.2 7.1 55.6% 1 160.69s 7,895 6,381 89,388

Quick Compare

Switch Comparison Pair