Navigate
AI BENCHY
Advertise here

Claude Opus 5 vs Qwen: Qwen3.5-27B

Claude Opus 5 leads on average score with 7.5 vs 7.4. Qwen3.5-27B (medium) has the lower benchmark cost at $0.981 vs $1.550. Claude Opus 5 is faster at 7.60s vs 111.94s, with pass rates of 57.6% vs 72.7%.

Recommended modelClaude Opus 5It has the best score here (7.5), while responding about 14.7x faster than Qwen3.5-27B (medium).

Last updated at: 2026-07-25

Metric Claude Opus 5 Claude Opus 5 none Release: 2026-07-25 Qwen3.5-27B Qwen3.5-27B medium Release: 2026-02-24
Score 7.5 7.4
Rank #59 #66
Reliability 10.0 10.0
Consistency 9.6 8.2
Tests Correct
Attempt pass rate 57.6% 72.7%
Flaky tests 1 5
Total Runs 66 66
Cost per result 12.912 8.324
Total Cost $1.550 $0.981
Input Price $5.000 / 1M $0.195 / 1M
Output Price $25.000 / 1M $1.560 / 1M
Total Input Tokens 185,550 111,635
Output Tokens 24,866 15,999
Reasoning Tokens 0 598,430
Response Time (avg) 7.60s 111.94s
Response Time (max) 47.72s 1026.43s
Response Time (total) 167.28s 2462.67s

Hamster playing table tennis

Prompt: Create a detailed SVG illustration of a hamster playing table tennis.

#59 Claude Opus 5

none
Cost
$0.271
Time
149.3s
Tokens
10,962 tok

#66 Qwen3.5-27B

medium
Cost
$0.008
Time
62.0s
Tokens
3,099 tok

Top Models by Score

Score vs Total Cost

Response Time (avg)

Score vs Response Time (avg)

Total Output Tokens

Score vs Total Output Tokens

Category Breakdown

Coding Score Consistency Attempt pass rate Flaky tests Tests Correct Response Time (avg) Input Tokens Output Tokens Reasoning Tokens
Claude Opus 5 5.9 9.7 33.3% 0 5.54s 10,590 2,886 0
Qwen3.5-27B 6.2 7.1 55.6% 1 160.69s 7,895 6,381 89,388

Quick Compare

Switch Comparison Pair