Navigate
AI BENCHY
Advertise here

Qwen3.7 Plus vs Grok 4.20 (medium)

The average score is effectively tied at 7.2 vs 7.1. Qwen3.7 Plus has the lower benchmark cost at $0.106 vs $0.777. Qwen3.7 Plus is faster at 12.09s vs 29.47s, with pass rates of 50.0% vs 63.6%.

Last updated at: 2026-07-28

Rank
#81
Total Output Tokens
58,097
Response Time (avg)
12.09s
Total Cost
$0.106
Rank
#85
Total Output Tokens
259,340
Response Time (avg)
29.47s
Total Cost
$0.777
Recommended model Qwen3.7 Plus

It has the best score here (7.2), while costing about 7.3x less than Grok 4.20 (medium).

Detailed comparison

Metric Qwen3.7 Plus Qwen3.7 Plus none Release: 2026-06-03 Grok 4.20 Grok 4.20 medium Release: 2026-03-31
Score 7.2 7.1
Rank #81 #85
Reliability 10.0 10.0
Consistency 10.0 8.5
Tests Correct
Attempt pass rate 50.0% 63.6%
Flaky tests 0 4
Total Runs 66 66
Cost per result 1.014 9.709
Total Cost $0.106 $0.777
Input Price $0.320 / 1M $1.250 / 1M
Output Price $1.280 / 1M $2.500 / 1M
Total Input Tokens 98,824 102,791
Output Tokens 58,097 5,363
Reasoning Tokens 0 253,977
Response Time (avg) 12.09s 29.47s
Response Time (max) 206.03s 199.66s
Response Time (total) 265.89s 648.35s

Hamster playing table tennis

Prompt: Create a detailed SVG illustration of a hamster playing table tennis.

#81 Qwen3.7 Plus

none
Cost
$0.019
Time
213.5s
Tokens
11,960 tok

#85 xAI: Grok 4.20

medium
Cost
$0.041
Time
110.3s
Tokens
16,336 tok

Top Models by Score

Score vs Total Cost

Response Time (avg)

Score vs Response Time (avg)

Total Output Tokens

Score vs Total Output Tokens

Category Breakdown

Coding Score Consistency Attempt pass rate Flaky tests Tests Correct Response Time (avg) Input Tokens Output Tokens Reasoning Tokens
Qwen3.7 Plus 5.5 10.0 33.3% 0 2.15s 7,911 639 0
Grok 4.20 6.3 6.6 55.6% 1 109.93s 8,307 268 103,150

Quick Compare

Switch Comparison Pair