Navigate
AI BENCHY
AD
Track all your projects in one dashboard. Get 📊stats, 🔥heatmaps and 👀recordings in one self-hosted dashboard.
uxwizz.com

AI BENCHY Compare

Anthropic: Claude Opus 4.8 vs xAI: Grok 4.20

Summary

Grok 4.20 (medium) leads on average score with 7.3 vs 7.2. Claude Opus 4.8 has the lower benchmark cost at $0.539 vs $0.609. Claude Opus 4.8 is faster at 3.48s vs 27.68s, with pass rates of 61.9% vs 63.5%.

Recommended modelClaude Opus 4.8Its score stays close to the best score here (7.2 vs 7.3), while responding about 8.0x faster than Grok 4.20 (medium).

Last updated at: 2026-07-14

Metric Claude Opus 4.8 Claude Opus 4.8 none Release: 2026-05-28 Grok 4.20 Grok 4.20 medium Release: 2026-03-31
Score 7.2 7.3
Rank #73 #69
Reliability 10.0 10.0
Consistency 9.2 8.8
Tests Correct
Attempt pass rate 61.9% 63.5%
Flaky tests 2 3
Total Runs 63 63
Cost per result 4.485 8.309
Total Cost $0.539 $0.609
Input Price $5.000 / 1M $1.250 / 1M
Output Price $25.000 / 1M $2.500 / 1M
Total Input Tokens 67,104 44,433
Output Tokens 8,107 1,819
Reasoning Tokens 0 219,524
Response Time (avg) 3.48s 27.68s
Response Time (max) 17.73s 199.66s
Response Time (total) 73.00s 581.26s

Generation showcase

Hamster playing table tennis

Prompt: Create a detailed SVG illustration of a hamster playing table tennis.

#73 Claude Opus 4.8

none
Cost
$0.053
Time
22.0s
Tokens
2,253 tok

#69 xAI: Grok 4.20

medium
Cost
$0.041
Time
110.3s
Tokens
16,336 tok

Top Models by Score

Score vs Total Cost

Response Time (avg)

Score vs Response Time (avg)

Total Output Tokens

Score vs Total Output Tokens

Category Breakdown

Coding Score Consistency Attempt pass rate Flaky tests Tests Correct Response Time (avg) Input Tokens Output Tokens Reasoning Tokens
Claude Opus 4.8 5.5 10.0 33.3% 0 3.29s 10,590 1,332 0
Grok 4.20 6.3 6.6 55.6% 1 109.93s 8,307 268 103,150

Quick Compare

Switch Comparison Pair