Navigate
AI BENCHY
Advertise here

Anthropic: Claude Opus 4.8 vs Xiaomi: MiMo-V2.5-Pro

Claude Opus 4.8 leads on average score with 7.3 vs 6.9. MiMo-V2.5-Pro (medium) has the lower benchmark cost at $0.187 vs $1.166. Claude Opus 4.8 is faster at 4.91s vs 33.92s, with pass rates of 63.6% vs 66.7%.

Recommended modelClaude Opus 4.8It has the best score here (7.3), while responding about 6.9x faster than MiMo-V2.5-Pro (medium).

Last updated at: 2026-07-25

Metric Claude Opus 4.8 Claude Opus 4.8 none Release: 2026-05-28 MiMo-V2.5-Pro MiMo-V2.5-Pro medium Release: 2026-04-22
Score 7.3 6.9
Rank #74 #92
Reliability 10.0 10.0
Consistency 9.2 8.2
Tests Correct
Attempt pass rate 63.6% 66.7%
Flaky tests 2 5
Total Runs 66 66
Cost per result 8.969 3.218
Total Cost $1.166 $0.187
Input Price $5.000 / 1M $0.435 / 1M
Output Price $25.000 / 1M $0.870 / 1M
Total Input Tokens 149,206 139,883
Output Tokens 16,797 15,521
Reasoning Tokens 0 130,992
Response Time (avg) 4.91s 33.92s
Response Time (max) 35.03s 197.54s
Response Time (total) 108.03s 746.19s

Hamster playing table tennis

Prompt: Create a detailed SVG illustration of a hamster playing table tennis.

#74 Claude Opus 4.8

none
Cost
$0.053
Time
22.0s
Tokens
2,253 tok

#92 MiMo-V2.5-Pro

medium
Invalid SVG
Cost
$0.000
Time
300.0s
Tokens
0 tok

Top Models by Score

Score vs Total Cost

Response Time (avg)

Score vs Response Time (avg)

Total Output Tokens

Score vs Total Output Tokens

Category Breakdown

Coding Score Consistency Attempt pass rate Flaky tests Tests Correct Response Time (avg) Input Tokens Output Tokens Reasoning Tokens
Claude Opus 4.8 5.5 10.0 33.3% 0 3.29s 10,590 1,332 0
MiMo-V2.5-Pro 6.2 4.7 66.7% 2 92.07s 6,543 780 51,218

Quick Compare

Switch Comparison Pair