Navigate
AI BENCHY
Advertise here

AI BENCHY Compare

Anthropic: Claude Opus 4.8 vs Xiaomi: MiMo-V2.5-Pro

Summary

Claude Opus 4.8 vs MiMo-V2.5-Pro benchmark comparison: MiMo-V2.5-Pro leads on average score with 7.5 vs 7.0. MiMo-V2.5-Pro has the lower benchmark cost at $0.106 vs $0.539. Claude Opus 4.8 is faster at 3.47s vs 26.13s, with pass rates of 61.9% vs 68.3%.

Recommended model: MiMo-V2.5-Pro - It has the best score here (7.5), while costing about 5.1x less than Claude Opus 4.8.

Last updated at: 2026-06-04

Metric Claude Opus 4.8 Claude Opus 4.8 none Release: 2026-05-28 MiMo-V2.5-Pro MiMo-V2.5-Pro medium Release: 2026-04-22
Score 7.0 7.5
Rank #68 #43
Reliability 10.0 10.0
Consistency 9.2 8.5
Tests Correct
Attempt pass rate 61.9% 68.3%
Flaky tests 2 4
Total Runs 63 63
Cost per result 4.485 2.541
Total Cost $0.539 $0.106
Input Price $5.000 / 1M $0.435 / 1M
Output Price $25.000 / 1M $0.870 / 1M
Total Input Tokens 67,104 40,854
Output Tokens 8,107 5,015
Reasoning Tokens 0 97,742
Response Time (avg) 3.47s 26.13s
Response Time (max) 17.73s 130.77s
Response Time (total) 72.90s 548.65s

Generation showcase

Hamster playing table tennis

Prompt: Create a detailed SVG illustration of a hamster playing table tennis.

#68 Claude Opus 4.8

none
Cost
$0.053
Time
22.0s
Tokens
2,253 tok

#43 MiMo-V2.5-Pro

medium
Invalid SVG
Cost
$0.000
Time
300.0s
Tokens
0 tok

Top Models by Score

Score vs Total Cost

Response Time (avg)

Score vs Response Time (avg)

Total Output Tokens

Score vs Total Output Tokens

Category Breakdown

Anti-AI Tricks Score Consistency Attempt pass rate Flaky tests Tests Correct Response Time (avg) Input Tokens Output Tokens Reasoning Tokens
Claude Opus 4.8 6.5 10.0 50.0% 0 3.40s 834 1,472 0
MiMo-V2.5-Pro 10.0 10.0 100.0% 0 3.26s 621 323 1,179
Coding Score Consistency Attempt pass rate Flaky tests Tests Correct Response Time (avg) Input Tokens Output Tokens Reasoning Tokens
Claude Opus 4.8 5.5 10.0 33.3% 0 3.29s 10,590 1,332 0
MiMo-V2.5-Pro 6.2 4.7 66.7% 2 92.07s 6,543 780 51,218
Combined Score Consistency Attempt pass rate Flaky tests Tests Correct Response Time (avg) Input Tokens Output Tokens Reasoning Tokens
Claude Opus 4.8 9.5 10.0 100.0% 0 17.73s 29,658 3,259 0
MiMo-V2.5-Pro 10.0 10.0 100.0% 0 53.36s 15,060 348 11,870
Data parsing and extraction Score Consistency Attempt pass rate Flaky tests Tests Correct Response Time (avg) Input Tokens Output Tokens Reasoning Tokens
Claude Opus 4.8 7.3 5.8 83.3% 1 1.77s 10,503 308 0
MiMo-V2.5-Pro 7.3 5.8 83.3% 1 18.81s 7,746 260 8,383
Domain specific Score Consistency Attempt pass rate Flaky tests Tests Correct Response Time (avg) Input Tokens Output Tokens Reasoning Tokens
Claude Opus 4.8 5.3 7.2 44.4% 1 1.66s 975 61 0
MiMo-V2.5-Pro 5.3 10.0 33.3% 0 37.87s 630 275 17,023
General Intelligence Score Consistency Attempt pass rate Flaky tests Tests Correct Response Time (avg) Input Tokens Output Tokens Reasoning Tokens
Claude Opus 4.8 10.0 10.0 100.0% 0 3.48s 708 230 0
MiMo-V2.5-Pro 5.5 10.0 0.0% 0 4.02s 492 155 163
Instructions following Score Consistency Attempt pass rate Flaky tests Tests Correct Response Time (avg) Input Tokens Output Tokens Reasoning Tokens
Claude Opus 4.8 9.9 10.0 100.0% 0 1.37s 909 95 0
MiMo-V2.5-Pro 9.9 10.0 100.0% 0 2.77s 672 82 803
Puzzle Solving Score Consistency Attempt pass rate Flaky tests Tests Correct Response Time (avg) Input Tokens Output Tokens Reasoning Tokens
Claude Opus 4.8 7.7 10.0 66.7% 0 2.74s 894 783 0
MiMo-V2.5-Pro 6.7 7.9 55.6% 1 5.31s 660 540 2,181
Tool Calling Score Consistency Attempt pass rate Flaky tests Tests Correct Response Time (avg) Input Tokens Output Tokens Reasoning Tokens
Claude Opus 4.8 10.0 10.0 100.0% 0 5.35s 11,775 355 0
MiMo-V2.5-Pro 10.0 10.0 100.0% 0 16.87s 8,220 311 2,908
Trivia Score Consistency Attempt pass rate Flaky tests Tests Correct Response Time (avg) Input Tokens Output Tokens Reasoning Tokens
Claude Opus 4.8 3.0 10.0 0.0% 0 3.41s 258 212 0
MiMo-V2.5-Pro 3.0 10.0 0.0% 0 12.46s 210 1,941 2,014

Quick Compare

Switch Comparison Pair