Navigate
AI BENCHY
Advertise here

DeepSeek V3.2 (medium) vs Qwen3.7 Plus

Qwen3.7 Plus leads on average score with 7.2 vs 7.0. DeepSeek V3.2 (medium) has the lower benchmark cost at $0.078 vs $0.106. Qwen3.7 Plus is faster at 12.09s vs 68.62s, with pass rates of 65.2% vs 50.0%.

Last updated at: 2026-07-28

Rank
#86
Total Output Tokens
128,848
Response Time (avg)
68.62s
Total Cost
$0.078
Rank
#81
Total Output Tokens
58,097
Response Time (avg)
12.09s
Total Cost
$0.106
Recommended model Qwen3.7 Plus

It has the best score here (7.2), while responding about 5.7x faster than DeepSeek V3.2 (medium).

Detailed comparison

Metric DeepSeek V3.2 DeepSeek V3.2 medium Release: 2025-12-01 Qwen3.7 Plus Qwen3.7 Plus none Release: 2026-06-03
Score 7.0 7.2
Rank #86 #81
Reliability 10.0 10.0
Consistency 7.4 10.0
Tests Correct
Attempt pass rate 65.2% 50.0%
Flaky tests 7 0
Total Runs 66 66
Cost per result 0.671 1.014
Total Cost $0.078 $0.106
Input Price $0.269 / 1M $0.320 / 1M
Output Price $0.400 / 1M $1.280 / 1M
Total Input Tokens 101,047 98,824
Output Tokens 11,834 58,097
Reasoning Tokens 117,014 0
Response Time (avg) 68.62s 12.09s
Response Time (max) 376.10s 206.03s
Response Time (total) 1509.53s 265.89s

Hamster playing table tennis

Prompt: Create a detailed SVG illustration of a hamster playing table tennis.

#86 DeepSeek V3.2

medium
Cost
$0.001
Time
53.6s
Tokens
1,932 tok

#81 Qwen3.7 Plus

none
Cost
$0.019
Time
213.5s
Tokens
11,960 tok

Top Models by Score

Score vs Total Cost

Response Time (avg)

Score vs Response Time (avg)

Total Output Tokens

Score vs Total Output Tokens

Category Breakdown

Coding Score Consistency Attempt pass rate Flaky tests Tests Correct Response Time (avg) Input Tokens Output Tokens Reasoning Tokens
DeepSeek V3.2 6.0 7.2 55.6% 1 248.68s 5,717 649 52,014
Qwen3.7 Plus 5.5 10.0 33.3% 0 2.15s 7,911 639 0

Quick Compare

Switch Comparison Pair