Navigate
AI BENCHY
AD
Track all your projects in one dashboard. Get 📊stats, 🔥heatmaps and 👀recordings in one self-hosted dashboard.
uxwizz.com

Qwen3.7 Plus vs GLM 5.1 (medium)

The average score is effectively tied at 7.2 vs 7.1. Qwen3.7 Plus has the lower benchmark cost at $0.106 vs $0.535. Qwen3.7 Plus is faster at 12.09s vs 46.77s, with pass rates of 50.0% vs 69.7%.

Last updated at: 2026-07-25

Rank
#79
Total Output Tokens
58,097
Response Time (avg)
12.09s
Total Cost
$0.106
Rank
#82
Total Output Tokens
152,552
Response Time (avg)
46.77s
Total Cost
$0.535
Recommended model Qwen3.7 Plus

It has the best score here (7.2), while costing about 5.0x less than GLM 5.1 (medium).

Detailed comparison

Metric Qwen3.7 Plus Qwen3.7 Plus none Release: 2026-06-03 GLM 5.1 GLM 5.1 medium Release: 2026-04-07
Score 7.2 7.1
Rank #79 #82
Reliability 10.0 8.3
Consistency 10.0 8.4
Tests Correct
Attempt pass rate 50.0% 69.7%
Flaky tests 0 4
Total Runs 66 66
Cost per result 1.014 4.202
Total Cost $0.106 $0.535
Input Price $0.320 / 1M $0.966 / 1M
Output Price $1.280 / 1M $3.036 / 1M
Total Input Tokens 98,824 82,623
Output Tokens 58,097 16,089
Reasoning Tokens 0 136,463
Response Time (avg) 12.09s 46.77s
Response Time (max) 206.03s 308.75s
Response Time (total) 265.89s 982.16s

Hamster playing table tennis

Prompt: Create a detailed SVG illustration of a hamster playing table tennis.

#79 Qwen3.7 Plus

none
Cost
$0.019
Time
213.5s
Tokens
11,960 tok

#82 GLM 5.1

medium
Invalid SVG
Cost
$0.000
Time
300.0s
Tokens
0 tok

Top Models by Score

Score vs Total Cost

Response Time (avg)

Score vs Response Time (avg)

Total Output Tokens

Score vs Total Output Tokens

Category Breakdown

Coding Score Consistency Attempt pass rate Flaky tests Tests Correct Response Time (avg) Input Tokens Output Tokens Reasoning Tokens
Qwen3.7 Plus 5.5 10.0 33.3% 0 2.15s 7,911 639 0
GLM 5.1 4.6 3.7 44.5% 2 109.63s 5,702 4,871 37,826

Quick Compare

Switch Comparison Pair