Navigate
AI BENCHY
AD
Track all your projects in one dashboard. Get 📊stats, 🔥heatmaps and 👀recordings in one self-hosted dashboard.
uxwizz.com

StepFun: Step 3.7 Flash vs Z.ai: GLM 5.1

Step 3.7 Flash (low) leads on average score with 7.3 vs 7.1. Step 3.7 Flash (low) has the lower benchmark cost at $0.454 vs $0.535. Step 3.7 Flash (low) is faster at 20.68s vs 46.77s, with pass rates of 68.2% vs 69.7%.

Recommended modelStep 3.7 Flash (low)It has the best score here (7.3), while responding about 2.3x faster than GLM 5.1 (medium).

Last updated at: 2026-07-17

Metric Step 3.7 Flash Step 3.7 Flash low Release: 2026-05-29 GLM 5.1 GLM 5.1 medium Release: 2026-04-07
Score 7.3 7.1
Rank #64 #71
Reliability 10.0 8.3
Consistency 8.1 8.4
Tests Correct
Attempt pass rate 68.2% 69.7%
Flaky tests 5 4
Total Runs 66 66
Cost per result 3.782 4.202
Total Cost $0.454 $0.535
Input Price $0.200 / 1M $0.966 / 1M
Output Price $1.150 / 1M $3.036 / 1M
Total Input Tokens 103,833 82,623
Output Tokens 376,581 16,089
Reasoning Tokens 0 136,463
Response Time (avg) 20.68s 46.77s
Response Time (max) 124.75s 308.75s
Response Time (total) 455.01s 982.16s

Hamster playing table tennis

Prompt: Create a detailed SVG illustration of a hamster playing table tennis.

#64 Step 3.7 Flash

low
Invalid SVG
Cost
$0.004
Time
25.3s
Tokens
3,072 tok

#71 GLM 5.1

medium
Invalid SVG
Cost
$0.000
Time
300.0s
Tokens
0 tok

Top Models by Score

Score vs Total Cost

Response Time (avg)

Score vs Response Time (avg)

Total Output Tokens

Score vs Total Output Tokens

Category Breakdown

Coding Score Consistency Attempt pass rate Flaky tests Tests Correct Response Time (avg) Input Tokens Output Tokens Reasoning Tokens
Step 3.7 Flash 8.2 7.2 88.9% 1 9.46s 7,437 18,685 0
GLM 5.1 4.6 3.7 44.5% 2 109.63s 5,702 4,871 37,826

Quick Compare

Switch Comparison Pair