Navigate
AI BENCHY
Advertise here

Seed-2.0-Code (high) vs GLM 5.1 (medium)

GLM 5.1 (medium) leads on average score with 7.0 vs 6.9. GLM 5.1 (medium) has the lower benchmark cost at $0.727 vs $1.273. GLM 5.1 (medium) is faster at 58.80s vs 124.18s, with pass rates of 63.6% vs 65.2%.

Last updated at: 2026-08-15

Rank
#125
Total Output Tokens
410,575
Response Time (avg)
124.18s
Total Cost
$1.273
Rank
#117
Total Output Tokens
215,889
Response Time (avg)
58.80s
Total Cost
$0.727
Recommended model GLM 5.1 (medium)

It has the best score here (7.0), while costing about 1.8x less than Seed-2.0-Code (high).

Detailed comparison

Metric Seed-2.0-Code Seed-2.0-Code high Release: 2026-08-12 GLM 5.1 GLM 5.1 medium Release: 2026-04-07
Score 6.9 7.0
Rank #125 #117
Reliability 8.6 8.1
Consistency 7.8 8.4
Attempts 66/66 66/66
Tests Correct
Attempt pass rate 63.6% 65.2%
Flaky tests 5 4
Total Runs 66 66
Cost per result 11.571 6.923
Total Cost $1.273 $0.727
Input Price $0.500 / 1M $0.966 / 1M
Output Price $3.000 / 1M $3.036 / 1M
Total Input Tokens 81,970 82,592
Output Tokens 7,186 16,089
Reasoning Tokens 403,389 199,800
Response Time (avg) 124.18s 58.80s
Response Time (max) 675.30s 308.75s
Response Time (total) 2732.03s 1234.72s
Parameters ~200B total (~20B active) 744B total (40B active)
Availability Closed Open source

Model generation showcase

Hamster playing table tennis

Prompt: Create a detailed SVG illustration of a hamster playing table tennis.

#125 Seed-2.0-Code

high
Cost
$0.037
Time
183.6s
Tokens
12,388 tok

#117 GLM 5.1

medium
Invalid SVG
Cost
$0.000
Time
300.0s
Tokens
0 tok

Top Models by Score

Score vs Total Cost

Response Time (avg)

Score vs Response Time (avg)

Total Output Tokens

Score vs Total Output Tokens

Category Breakdown

Coding Score Consistency Attempt pass rate Flaky tests Tests Correct Response Time (avg) Input Tokens Output Tokens Reasoning Tokens
Seed-2.0-Code 6.2 6.5 55.6% 1 266.74s 6,750 432 124,956
GLM 5.1 4.6 3.7 44.5% 2 109.63s 5,702 4,871 37,826

Quick Compare

Switch Comparison Pair