Navigate
AD
Track all your projects in one dashboard. Get 📊stats, 🔥heatmaps and 👀recordings in one self-hosted dashboard.
uxwizz.com

Seed-2.0-Code (high) vs Qwen3.8 Flash Next (medium)

Qwen3.8 Flash Next (medium) leads on average score with 7.6 vs 7.5. Qwen3.8 Flash Next (medium) has the lower benchmark cost at ~$0.047 vs $1.448. Qwen3.8 Flash Next (medium) is faster at 24.79s vs 124.87s, with pass rates of 65.2% vs 75.4%.

Last updated at: 2026-10-05

Compared models

Rank
#125
Total Output Tokens
432,850
Response Time (avg)
124.87s
Total Cost
$1.448
Rank
#119
Total Output Tokens
143,965
Response Time (avg)
24.79s
Total Cost
~$0.047
Recommended model Qwen3.8 Flash Next (medium)

It has the best score here (7.6), while costing about 30.8x less than Seed-2.0-Code (high).

Detailed comparison

Metric Seed-2.0-Code Seed-2.0-Code high Release: 2026-08-12 Qwen3.8 Flash Next Qwen3.8 Flash Next medium Release: 2026-10-04
Score 7.5 7.6
Rank #125 #119
Reliability 9.0 10.0
Consistency 7.9 7.9
Attempts 69/69 69/69
Tests Correct
Attempt pass rate 65.2% 75.4%
Flaky tests 5 6
Total Runs 69 69
Cost per result 12.061 ~0.314
Total Cost $1.448 ~$0.047
Input Price $0.500 / 1M N/A
Output Price $3.000 / 1M N/A
Cache Read Price N/A N/A
Cache Write Price N/A N/A
Total Input Tokens 297,321 278,792
Output Tokens 8,997 1,695
Reasoning Tokens 423,853 142,270
Response Time (avg) 124.87s 24.79s
Response Time (max) 675.30s 159.62s
Response Time (total) 2871.96s 570.26s
Parameters ~200B total (~20B active) 180B total (6B active)
Availability Closed Weights available

Cache prices apply to input tokens. Reads reuse cached prompts; writes store them and can cost extra. Output tokens use the output price.

Model generation showcase

Hamster playing table tennis

Prompt: Create a detailed SVG illustration of a hamster playing table tennis.

#125 Seed-2.0-Code

high
Cost
$0.037
Time
183.6s
Tokens
12,388 tok

#119 Qwen3.8 Flash Next

medium
Cost
~$0.002
Time
40.7s
Tokens
4,059 tok

Top Models by Score

Score vs Total Cost

Response Time (avg)

Score vs Response Time (avg)

Total Output Tokens

Score vs Total Output Tokens

Category Breakdown

Coding Score Consistency Attempt pass rate Flaky tests Tests Correct Response Time (avg) Input Tokens Output Tokens Reasoning Tokens
Seed-2.0-Code 6.2 6.5 55.6% 1 266.74s 6,750 432 124,956
Qwen3.8 Flash Next 10.0 10.0 100.0% 0 45.53s 7,893 346 37,643

Quick Compare

Switch Comparison Pair