Navigate
AI BENCHY
Advertise here

Poolside: Laguna S 2.1 vs Qwen: Qwen3.5-122B-A10B

Qwen3.5-122B-A10B leads on average score with 5.7 vs 5.4. Laguna S 2.1 (medium) has the lower benchmark cost at $0.059 vs $0.247. Qwen3.5-122B-A10B is faster at 12.92s vs 58.43s, with pass rates of 25.8% vs 33.3%.

Recommended modelQwen3.5-122B-A10BIt has the best score here (5.7), while responding about 4.5x faster than Laguna S 2.1 (medium).

Last updated at: 2026-07-22

Metric Laguna S 2.1 Laguna S 2.1 medium Release: 2026-07-21 Free Available Qwen3.5-122B-A10B Qwen3.5-122B-A10B none Release: 2026-02-24
Score 5.4 5.7
Rank #164 #148
Reliability 9.8 10.0
Consistency 8.4 9.3
Tests Correct
Attempt pass rate 25.8% 33.3%
Flaky tests 4 2
Total Runs 66 66
Cost per result 1.451 4.182
Total Cost $0.059 $0.247
Input Price $0.100 / 1M $0.260 / 1M
Output Price $0.200 / 1M $2.080 / 1M
Total Input Tokens 86,641 241,566
Output Tokens 97,298 88,458
Reasoning Tokens 242,297 0
Response Time (avg) 58.43s 12.92s
Response Time (max) 560.31s 212.63s
Response Time (total) 1285.48s 284.21s

Hamster playing table tennis

Prompt: Create a detailed SVG illustration of a hamster playing table tennis.

#164 Laguna S 2.1

medium
Cost
$0.001
Time
4.0s
Tokens
867 tok

#148 Qwen3.5-122B-A10B

none
Cost
$0.016
Time
44.5s
Tokens
6,431 tok

Top Models by Score

Score vs Total Cost

Response Time (avg)

Score vs Response Time (avg)

Total Output Tokens

Score vs Total Output Tokens

Category Breakdown

Coding Score Consistency Attempt pass rate Flaky tests Tests Correct Response Time (avg) Input Tokens Output Tokens Reasoning Tokens
Laguna S 2.1 5.3 7.2 44.4% 1 158.98s 7,917 93,354 106,718
Qwen3.5-122B-A10B 3.7 7.0 22.2% 1 2.77s 7,913 693 0

Quick Compare

Switch Comparison Pair