Navigate
AI BENCHY
AD
Track all your projects in one dashboard. Get 📊stats, 🔥heatmaps and 👀recordings in one self-hosted dashboard.
uxwizz.com

OpenAI: GPT-5.5 vs Qwen: Qwen3.7 Plus

GPT-5.5 (low) leads on average score with 9.3 vs 7.2. Qwen3.7 Plus has the lower benchmark cost at $0.106 vs $1.253. GPT-5.5 (low) is faster at 10.13s vs 12.09s, with pass rates of 86.4% vs 50.0%.

Recommended modelGPT-5.5 (low)It has the strongest score in this comparison (9.3) and the best overall balance of cost and response time across all 2 models.

Last updated at: 2026-07-18

Metric GPT-5.5 GPT-5.5 low Release: 2026-04-24 Qwen3.7 Plus Qwen3.7 Plus none Release: 2026-06-03
Score 9.3 7.2
Rank #6 #70
Reliability 10.0 10.0
Consistency 10.0 10.0
Tests Correct
Attempt pass rate 86.4% 50.0%
Flaky tests 0 0
Total Runs 66 66
Cost per result 6.594 1.014
Total Cost $1.253 $0.106
Input Price $5.000 / 1M $0.320 / 1M
Output Price $30.000 / 1M $1.280 / 1M
Total Input Tokens 80,058 98,824
Output Tokens 5,378 58,097
Reasoning Tokens 23,040 0
Response Time (avg) 10.13s 12.09s
Response Time (max) 56.19s 206.03s
Response Time (total) 222.82s 265.89s

Hamster playing table tennis

Prompt: Create a detailed SVG illustration of a hamster playing table tennis.

#6 GPT-5.5

low
Cost
$0.068
Time
37.0s
Tokens
2,339 tok

#70 Qwen3.7 Plus

none
Cost
$0.019
Time
213.5s
Tokens
11,960 tok

Top Models by Score

Score vs Total Cost

Response Time (avg)

Score vs Response Time (avg)

Total Output Tokens

Score vs Total Output Tokens

Category Breakdown

Coding Score Consistency Attempt pass rate Flaky tests Tests Correct Response Time (avg) Input Tokens Output Tokens Reasoning Tokens
GPT-5.5 10.0 10.0 100.0% 0 15.04s 7,302 423 6,402
Qwen3.7 Plus 5.5 10.0 33.3% 0 2.15s 7,911 639 0

Quick Compare

Switch Comparison Pair