Navigate
AI BENCHY
Advertise here

MoonshotAI: Kimi K2.5 vs Qwen: Qwen3.7 Plus

Qwen3.7 Plus leads on average score with 7.2 vs 7.0. Qwen3.7 Plus has the lower benchmark cost at $0.106 vs $0.600. Qwen3.7 Plus is faster at 12.09s vs 99.00s, with pass rates of 65.2% vs 50.0%.

Recommended modelQwen3.7 PlusIt has the best score here (7.2), while costing about 5.7x less than Kimi K2.5 (medium).

Last updated at: 2026-07-18

Metric Kimi K2.5 Kimi K2.5 medium Release: 2026-01-27 Qwen3.7 Plus Qwen3.7 Plus none Release: 2026-06-03
Score 7.0 7.2
Rank #76 #70
Reliability 10.0 10.0
Consistency 7.0 10.0
Tests Correct
Attempt pass rate 65.2% 50.0%
Flaky tests 8 0
Total Runs 66 66
Cost per result 4.789 1.014
Total Cost $0.600 $0.106
Input Price $0.571 / 1M $0.320 / 1M
Output Price $2.850 / 1M $1.280 / 1M
Total Input Tokens 118,448 98,824
Output Tokens 62,124 58,097
Reasoning Tokens 165,243 0
Response Time (avg) 99.00s 12.09s
Response Time (max) 281.00s 206.03s
Response Time (total) 1485.04s 265.89s

Hamster playing table tennis

Prompt: Create a detailed SVG illustration of a hamster playing table tennis.

#76 MoonshotAI: Kimi K2.5

medium
Cost
$0.030
Time
58.6s
Tokens
8,683 tok

#70 Qwen3.7 Plus

none
Cost
$0.019
Time
213.5s
Tokens
11,960 tok

Top Models by Score

Score vs Total Cost

Response Time (avg)

Score vs Response Time (avg)

Total Output Tokens

Score vs Total Output Tokens

Category Breakdown

Coding Score Consistency Attempt pass rate Flaky tests Tests Correct Response Time (avg) Input Tokens Output Tokens Reasoning Tokens
Kimi K2.5 6.1 4.6 66.7% 2 217.49s 6,935 5,705 74,693
Qwen3.7 Plus 5.5 10.0 33.3% 0 2.15s 7,911 639 0

Quick Compare

Switch Comparison Pair