Navigate
AI BENCHY
Advertise here

Google: Gemini 3.5 Flash vs MoonshotAI: Kimi K2.5

The average score is effectively tied at 7.0 vs 7.0. Kimi K2.5 (medium) has the lower benchmark cost at $0.600 vs $1.079. Gemini 3.5 Flash is faster at 9.93s vs 99.00s, with pass rates of 74.2% vs 65.2%.

Recommended modelGemini 3.5 FlashIt has the best score here (7.0), while responding about 10.0x faster than Kimi K2.5 (medium).

Last updated at: 2026-07-17

Metric Gemini 3.5 Flash Gemini 3.5 Flash none Release: 2026-05-19 Kimi K2.5 Kimi K2.5 medium Release: 2026-01-27
Score 7.0 7.0
Rank #76 #74
Reliability 10.0 10.0
Consistency 8.9 7.0
Tests Correct
Attempt pass rate 74.2% 65.2%
Flaky tests 3 8
Total Runs 66 66
Cost per result 7.190 4.789
Total Cost $1.079 $0.600
Input Price $1.500 / 1M $0.571 / 1M
Output Price $9.000 / 1M $2.850 / 1M
Total Input Tokens 13,843 118,448
Output Tokens 117,518 62,124
Reasoning Tokens 0 165,243
Response Time (avg) 9.93s 99.00s
Response Time (max) 64.36s 281.00s
Response Time (total) 178.68s 1485.04s

Hamster playing table tennis

Prompt: Create a detailed SVG illustration of a hamster playing table tennis.

#76 Gemini 3.5 Flash

none
Cost
$0.225
Time
125.5s
Tokens
25,004 tok

#74 MoonshotAI: Kimi K2.5

medium
Cost
$0.030
Time
58.6s
Tokens
8,683 tok

Top Models by Score

Score vs Total Cost

Response Time (avg)

Score vs Response Time (avg)

Total Output Tokens

Score vs Total Output Tokens

Category Breakdown

Coding Score Consistency Attempt pass rate Flaky tests Tests Correct Response Time (avg) Input Tokens Output Tokens Reasoning Tokens
Gemini 3.5 Flash 8.8 7.8 88.9% 1 34.69s 8,122 75,927 0
Kimi K2.5 6.1 4.6 66.7% 2 217.49s 6,935 5,705 74,693

Quick Compare

Switch Comparison Pair