Navigate
AI BENCHY
Advertise here

Inception: Mercury 2 vs Qwen: Qwen3.7 Plus

Qwen3.7 Plus leads on average score with 7.2 vs 7.0. Mercury 2 (medium) has the lower benchmark cost at $0.093 vs $0.106. Mercury 2 (medium) is faster at 2.72s vs 12.09s, with pass rates of 51.5% vs 50.0%.

Recommended modelMercury 2 (medium)Its score stays close to the best score here (7.0 vs 7.2), while responding about 4.4x faster than Qwen3.7 Plus.

Last updated at: 2026-07-18

Metric Mercury 2 Mercury 2 medium Release: 2026-02-24 Qwen3.7 Plus Qwen3.7 Plus none Release: 2026-06-03
Score 7.0 7.2
Rank #77 #70
Reliability 10.0 10.0
Consistency 8.8 10.0
Tests Correct
Attempt pass rate 51.5% 50.0%
Flaky tests 3 0
Total Runs 66 66
Cost per result 0.928 1.014
Total Cost $0.093 $0.106
Input Price $0.250 / 1M $0.320 / 1M
Output Price $0.750 / 1M $1.280 / 1M
Total Input Tokens 109,572 98,824
Output Tokens 10,313 58,097
Reasoning Tokens 76,806 0
Response Time (avg) 2.72s 12.09s
Response Time (max) 14.63s 206.03s
Response Time (total) 57.12s 265.89s

Hamster playing table tennis

Prompt: Create a detailed SVG illustration of a hamster playing table tennis.

#77 Mercury 2

medium
Cost
$0.002
Time
2.1s
Tokens
1,702 tok

#70 Qwen3.7 Plus

none
Cost
$0.019
Time
213.5s
Tokens
11,960 tok

Top Models by Score

Score vs Total Cost

Response Time (avg)

Score vs Response Time (avg)

Total Output Tokens

Score vs Total Output Tokens

Category Breakdown

Coding Score Consistency Attempt pass rate Flaky tests Tests Correct Response Time (avg) Input Tokens Output Tokens Reasoning Tokens
Mercury 2 8.2 7.7 77.8% 1 2.04s 7,065 296 11,328
Qwen3.7 Plus 5.5 10.0 33.3% 0 2.15s 7,911 639 0

Quick Compare

Switch Comparison Pair