Navigate
AI BENCHY
AD
Track all your projects in one dashboard. Get 📊stats, 🔥heatmaps and 👀recordings in one self-hosted dashboard.
uxwizz.com

Google: Gemini 3.5 Flash-Lite vs Qwen: Qwen3.6 Max Preview

The average score is effectively tied at 6.5 vs 6.6. Qwen3.6 Max Preview has the lower benchmark cost at $0.231 vs $0.369. Gemini 3.5 Flash-Lite (medium) is faster at 6.01s vs 7.82s, with pass rates of 69.7% vs 60.6%.

Recommended modelQwen3.6 Max PreviewIt has the best score here (6.6), while costing about 1.6x less than Gemini 3.5 Flash-Lite (medium).

Last updated at: 2026-07-21

Metric Gemini 3.5 Flash-Lite Gemini 3.5 Flash-Lite medium Release: 2026-07-21 Qwen3.6 Max Preview Qwen3.6 Max Preview none Release: 2026-04-20
Score 6.5 6.6
Rank #104 #103
Reliability 10.0 9.9
Consistency 7.4 9.3
Tests Correct
Attempt pass rate 69.7% 60.6%
Flaky tests 7 2
Total Runs 66 66
Cost per result 3.074 2.061
Total Cost $0.369 $0.231
Input Price $0.300 / 1M $1.040 / 1M
Output Price $2.500 / 1M $6.240 / 1M
Total Input Tokens 118,818 106,339
Output Tokens 11,677 19,257
Reasoning Tokens 121,611 0
Response Time (avg) 6.01s 7.82s
Response Time (max) 49.03s 102.62s
Response Time (total) 132.30s 172.01s

Hamster playing table tennis

Prompt: Create a detailed SVG illustration of a hamster playing table tennis.

#104 Gemini 3.5 Flash-Lite

medium
Cost
$0.015
Time
16.4s
Tokens
5,971 tok

#103 Qwen3.6 Max Preview

none
Cost
$0.025
Time
83.9s
Tokens
4,066 tok

Top Models by Score

Score vs Total Cost

Response Time (avg)

Score vs Response Time (avg)

Total Output Tokens

Score vs Total Output Tokens

Category Breakdown

Coding Score Consistency Attempt pass rate Flaky tests Tests Correct Response Time (avg) Input Tokens Output Tokens Reasoning Tokens
Gemini 3.5 Flash-Lite 5.5 7.4 44.4% 1 8.37s 8,136 452 25,999
Qwen3.6 Max Preview 3.8 7.3 22.2% 1 3.12s 7,913 456 0

Quick Compare

Switch Comparison Pair