Navigate
AI BENCHY
AD
Track all your projects in one dashboard. Get 📊stats, 🔥heatmaps and 👀recordings in one self-hosted dashboard.
uxwizz.com

Google: Gemma 4 26B A4B vs Qwen: Qwen3.6 Max Preview

The average score is effectively tied at 6.6 vs 6.6. Gemma 4 26B A4B (medium) has the lower benchmark cost at $0.082 vs $0.231. Qwen3.6 Max Preview is faster at 7.82s vs 103.83s, with pass rates of 66.7% vs 60.6%.

Recommended modelQwen3.6 Max PreviewIt has the best score here (6.6), while responding about 13.3x faster than Gemma 4 26B A4B (medium).

Last updated at: 2026-07-17

Metric Gemma 4 26B A4B Gemma 4 26B A4B medium Release: 2026-04-03 Free Available Qwen3.6 Max Preview Qwen3.6 Max Preview none Release: 2026-04-20
Score 6.6 6.6
Rank #91 #93
Reliability 9.4 9.9
Consistency 9.2 9.3
Tests Correct
Attempt pass rate 66.7% 60.6%
Flaky tests 2 2
Total Runs 66 66
Cost per result 0.643 2.061
Total Cost $0.082 $0.231
Input Price $0.100 / 1M $1.040 / 1M
Output Price $0.300 / 1M $6.240 / 1M
Total Input Tokens 77,550 106,339
Output Tokens 28,036 19,257
Reasoning Tokens 219,491 0
Response Time (avg) 103.83s 7.82s
Response Time (max) 912.19s 102.62s
Response Time (total) 2180.47s 172.01s

Hamster playing table tennis

Prompt: Create a detailed SVG illustration of a hamster playing table tennis.

#91 Gemma 4 26B A4B

medium
Invalid SVG
Cost
$0.000
Time
300.0s
Tokens
0 tok

#93 Qwen3.6 Max Preview

none
Cost
$0.025
Time
83.9s
Tokens
4,066 tok

Top Models by Score

Score vs Total Cost

Response Time (avg)

Score vs Response Time (avg)

Total Output Tokens

Score vs Total Output Tokens

Category Breakdown

Coding Score Consistency Attempt pass rate Flaky tests Tests Correct Response Time (avg) Input Tokens Output Tokens Reasoning Tokens
Gemma 4 26B A4B 2.9 10.0 0.0% 0 272.54s 5,062 14,838 44,567
Qwen3.6 Max Preview 3.8 7.3 22.2% 1 3.12s 7,913 456 0

Quick Compare

Switch Comparison Pair