- Score
- 7.5 (+0.20 points)
- Total Cost (Current Price)
- $0.000 · 100.0% cheaper
- Response Time (avg)
- 29.38s · 72.0% faster
Summary
Gemma 4 26B A4B scores 7.3 on AI BENCHY and ranks #131. It has 10.0 reliability, a 71.0% pass rate, $0.101 total cost, and 105.03s average response time.
What makes Gemma 4 26B A4B unique: It stands out most in General Intelligence, where it ranks #1, while Coding is its weakest area at #17. Its total benchmark cost is unusually low for its score range.
Recommended alternatives
We recommend choosing one of these models instead:
- Score
- 8.3 (+0.93 points)
- Total Cost (Current Price)
- $0.047 · 53.6% cheaper
- Response Time (avg)
- 18.07s · 82.8% faster
- Score
- 7.4 (+0.08 points)
- Total Cost (Current Price)
- $0.065 · 36.2% cheaper
- Response Time (avg)
- 9.64s · 90.8% faster
Model facts
Researched on 2026-08-12
- Parameters
- 25.2B total (3.8B active)
- Architecture
- MoE
- Availability
- Open source
- License
- Apache-2.0
7.3
Consistency
9.6
10.0
Total Output Tokens
269,351
Total Input Tokens
224,367
Input Price
$0.090 / 1M
Output Price
$0.300 / 1M
Cache Read Price
$0.050 / 1M
Cache Write Price
N/A
Cache prices apply to input tokens. Reads reuse cached prompts; writes store them and can cost extra. Output tokens use the output price.
Flaky tests
1
Flaky tests had mixed outcomes across runs (at least one pass and one fail).
Hamster playing table tennis
Prompt: Create a detailed SVG illustration of a hamster playing table tennis.
#131 Gemma 4 26B A4B
medium- Cost
- $0.000
- Time
- 300.0s
- Tokens
- 0 tok
Run history
| Tested on | Score | Reliability | Tests Correct | Total Cost | Compare |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2026-10-01 02:35 Re-test | 7.3 | 10.0 | $0.101 ↓ | Current run | |
| 2026-07-16 23:43 New test added | 6.6 | 9.4 | $0.082 ↓ | Compare | |
| 2026-06-04 14:22 New test added | 7.6 | 8.9 | $0.045 ↓ | Compare | |
| 2026-05-22 00:42 Suite changed | 7.5 | 10.0 | $0.045 | Compare | |
| 2026-04-22 21:39 First recorded run | 8.0 | N/A | $0.028 | Compare |
This run used a different benchmark suite. Keep suite changes in mind when reading historical movement.
Price History
Historical pricing data for this model from OpenRouter.
| Date | Input Price | Output Price | Cache Read Price | Cache Write Price |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2026-06-04 15:40 | $0.060 / 1M | $0.330 / 1M | N/A | N/A |
| 2026-07-16 15:36 | $0.100 / 1M | $0.300 / 1M | N/A | N/A |
| 2026-07-20 15:56 | $0.070 / 1M | $0.340 / 1M | N/A | N/A |
| 2026-07-24 00:05 | $0.120 / 1M | $0.350 / 1M | N/A | N/A |
| 2026-07-28 08:40 | $0.140 / 1M | $0.420 / 1M | N/A | N/A |
| 2026-08-14 12:51 | $0.120 / 1M | $0.400 / 1M | N/A | N/A |
| 2026-10-01 18:33 | $0.090 / 1M | $0.300 / 1M | $0.050 / 1M | N/A |
Charts
Choose the first model, then click a second model to open a side-by-side page.
Top Models by Score
Score vs Total Cost
Response Time (avg)
Score vs Response Time (avg)
Total Output Tokens
Score vs Total Output Tokens
Quick Compare
Category Breakdown
| Category | Score | Consistency | Tests Correct |
|---|---|---|---|
| Agentic | 10.0 | 10.0 | |
| Anti-AI Tricks | 10.0 | 10.0 | |
| Coding | 2.9 | 10.0 | |
| Combined | 6.3 | 10.0 | |
| Data parsing and extraction | 10.0 | 10.0 | |
| Domain specific | 5.3 | 7.2 | |
| General Intelligence | 10.0 | 10.0 | |
| Instructions following | 10.0 | 10.0 | |
| Puzzle Solving | 10.0 | 10.0 | |
| Tool Calling | 10.0 | 10.0 | |
| Trivia | 3.0 | 10.0 |