#135 Gemma 4 26B A4B
medium
Invalid SVG
- Cost
- $0.000
- Time
- 300.0s
- Tokens
- 0 tok
Google
Release: 2026-04-03
Tested on: 2026-08-14 02:53
google/gemma-4-26b-a4b-it::medium
25.2B total (3.8B active)MoEOpen source
(medium)
(none)
Summary
Gemma 4 26B A4B scores 6.8 on AI BENCHY and ranks #135. It has 10.0 reliability, a 69.7% pass rate, $0.111 total cost, and 104.93s average response time.
What makes Gemma 4 26B A4B unique: It stands out most in Instructions following, where it ranks #1, while Coding is its weakest area at #15.
Model facts
Researched on 2026-08-12
- Parameters
- 25.2B total (3.8B active)
- Architecture
- MoE
- Availability
- Open source
- License
- Apache-2.0
6.8
Consistency
9.6
10.0
Total Output Tokens
253,646
Total Input Tokens
77,528
Input Price
$0.120 / 1M
Output Price
$0.400 / 1M
Flaky tests
1
Flaky tests had mixed outcomes across runs (at least one pass and one fail).
Hamster playing table tennis
Prompt: Create a detailed SVG illustration of a hamster playing table tennis.
Run history
| Tested on | Score | Reliability | Tests Correct | Total Cost | Compare |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2026-08-14 02:53 Re-test | 6.8 | 10.0 | $0.111 ↑ | Current run | |
| 2026-07-16 23:43 New test added | 6.6 | 9.4 | $0.082 ↓ | Compare | |
| 2026-06-04 14:22 New test added | 7.6 | 8.9 | $0.045 ↓ | Compare | |
| 2026-05-22 00:42 Suite changed | 7.5 | 10.0 | $0.045 | Compare | |
| 2026-04-22 21:39 First recorded run | 8.0 | N/A | $0.028 | Compare |
This run used a different benchmark suite. Keep suite changes in mind when reading historical movement.
Run comparison
| Run | Benchmark coverage | Score | Consistency | Reliability | Tests Correct | Flaky tests | Total Output Tokens | Total Input Tokens | Total Cost | Response Time (avg) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2026-08-14 02:53 · Current run | 66/66 attempts | 6.8 | 9.6 | 10.0 | 15/22 | 1 | 253,646 | 77,528 | $0.111 | 104.93s |
| 2026-07-16 23:43 · New test added | 66/66 attempts | 6.6 | 9.2 | 9.4 | 14/22 | 2 | 247,527 | 77,550 | $0.082 | 103.83s |
| Difference | — | +0.1 | +0.4 | +0.6 | +1 | -1 | +6119 | -22 | +$0.030 | +1098ms |
These two runs used different benchmark suites, so the deltas reflect both model changes and suite changes.
Price History
Historical pricing data for this model from OpenRouter.
| Date | Input Price | Output Price |
|---|---|---|
| 2026-06-04 15:40 | $0.060 / 1M | $0.330 / 1M |
| 2026-07-16 15:36 | $0.100 / 1M | $0.300 / 1M |
| 2026-07-20 15:56 | $0.070 / 1M | $0.340 / 1M |
| 2026-07-24 00:05 | $0.120 / 1M | $0.350 / 1M |
| 2026-07-28 08:40 | $0.140 / 1M | $0.420 / 1M |
| 2026-08-14 12:51 | $0.120 / 1M | $0.400 / 1M |
Charts
Choose the first model, then click a second model to open a side-by-side page.
Top Models by Score
Score vs Total Cost
Response Time (avg)
Score vs Response Time (avg)
Total Output Tokens
Score vs Total Output Tokens
Quick Compare
Gemma 4 26B A4BmediumFree AvailablevsGemini 3 Flash PreviewnoneGemma 4 26B A4BmediumFree AvailablevsGLM 5.2noneGemma 4 26B A4BmediumFree AvailablevsMiMo-V2.5-PromediumGemma 4 26B A4BmediumFree AvailablevsKAT-Coder-Pro V2.5noneGemma 4 26B A4BmediumFree AvailablevsDeepSeek V4 PrononeGemma 4 26B A4BmediumFree AvailablevsLongCat 2.0lowGemma 4 26B A4BmediumFree AvailablevsSolar Pro 4mediumGemma 4 26B A4BmediumFree AvailablevsGemini 3.5 FlashminimalGemma 4 26B A4BmediumFree AvailablevsSolar Pro 4lowGemma 4 26B A4BmediumFree AvailablevsLongCat 2.0high
Category Breakdown
| Category | Score | Consistency | Tests Correct |
|---|---|---|---|
| Anti-AI Tricks | 10.0 | 10.0 | |
| Coding | 2.9 | 10.0 | |
| Combined | 6.3 | 10.0 | |
| Data parsing and extraction | 10.0 | 10.0 | |
| Domain specific | 5.3 | 7.2 | |
| General Intelligence | 10.0 | 10.0 | |
| Instructions following | 10.0 | 10.0 | |
| Puzzle Solving | 10.0 | 10.0 | |
| Tool Calling | 10.0 | 10.0 | |
| Trivia | 3.0 | 10.0 |