Navigate
AI BENCHY
Advertise here

Google: Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite vs Qwen: Qwen3.6 Max Preview

Qwen3.6 Max Preview leads on average score with 6.6 vs 6.5. Qwen3.6 Max Preview has the lower benchmark cost at $0.231 vs $0.621. Qwen3.6 Max Preview is faster at 7.82s vs 16.26s, with pass rates of 59.1% vs 60.6%.

Recommended modelQwen3.6 Max PreviewIt has the best score here (6.6), while costing about 2.7x less than Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite (low).

Last updated at: 2026-07-17

Metric Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite low Release: 2026-05-08 Qwen3.6 Max Preview Qwen3.6 Max Preview none Release: 2026-04-20
Score 6.5 6.6
Rank #100 #93
Reliability 10.0 9.9
Consistency 9.2 9.3
Tests Correct
Attempt pass rate 59.1% 60.6%
Flaky tests 2 2
Total Runs 66 66
Cost per result 5.170 2.061
Total Cost $0.621 $0.231
Input Price $0.250 / 1M $1.040 / 1M
Output Price $1.500 / 1M $6.240 / 1M
Total Input Tokens 94,224 106,339
Output Tokens 7,759 19,257
Reasoning Tokens 390,126 0
Response Time (avg) 16.26s 7.82s
Response Time (max) 318.02s 102.62s
Response Time (total) 357.64s 172.01s

Hamster playing table tennis

Prompt: Create a detailed SVG illustration of a hamster playing table tennis.

#100 Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite

low
Cost
$0.003
Time
4.0s
Tokens
1,479 tok

#93 Qwen3.6 Max Preview

none
Cost
$0.025
Time
83.9s
Tokens
4,066 tok

Top Models by Score

Score vs Total Cost

Response Time (avg)

Score vs Response Time (avg)

Total Output Tokens

Score vs Total Output Tokens

Category Breakdown

Coding Score Consistency Attempt pass rate Flaky tests Tests Correct Response Time (avg) Input Tokens Output Tokens Reasoning Tokens
Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite 5.5 10.0 33.3% 0 1.53s 8,132 471 1,072
Qwen3.6 Max Preview 3.8 7.3 22.2% 1 3.12s 7,913 456 0

Quick Compare

Switch Comparison Pair