Navigate
AI BENCHY
Advertise here

Google: Gemini 3.5 Flash vs Qwen: Qwen3.6 Max Preview

Gemini 3.5 Flash (minimal) leads on average score with 6.8 vs 6.6. Qwen3.6 Max Preview has the lower benchmark cost at $0.231 vs $0.300. Gemini 3.5 Flash (minimal) is faster at 2.65s vs 7.82s, with pass rates of 65.2% vs 60.6%.

Recommended modelGemini 3.5 Flash (minimal)It has the best score here (6.8), while responding about 3.0x faster than Qwen3.6 Max Preview.

Last updated at: 2026-07-17

Metric Gemini 3.5 Flash Gemini 3.5 Flash minimal Release: 2026-05-19 Qwen3.6 Max Preview Qwen3.6 Max Preview none Release: 2026-04-20
Score 6.8 6.6
Rank #85 #93
Reliability 10.0 9.9
Consistency 9.6 9.3
Tests Correct
Attempt pass rate 65.2% 60.6%
Flaky tests 1 2
Total Runs 66 66
Cost per result 2.138 2.061
Total Cost $0.300 $0.231
Input Price $1.500 / 1M $1.040 / 1M
Output Price $9.000 / 1M $6.240 / 1M
Total Input Tokens 100,753 106,339
Output Tokens 16,454 19,257
Reasoning Tokens 0 0
Response Time (avg) 2.65s 7.82s
Response Time (max) 25.26s 102.62s
Response Time (total) 58.27s 172.01s

Hamster playing table tennis

Prompt: Create a detailed SVG illustration of a hamster playing table tennis.

#85 Gemini 3.5 Flash

minimal
Cost
$0.041
Time
20.4s
Tokens
4,608 tok

#93 Qwen3.6 Max Preview

none
Cost
$0.025
Time
83.9s
Tokens
4,066 tok

Top Models by Score

Score vs Total Cost

Response Time (avg)

Score vs Response Time (avg)

Total Output Tokens

Score vs Total Output Tokens

Category Breakdown

Coding Score Consistency Attempt pass rate Flaky tests Tests Correct Response Time (avg) Input Tokens Output Tokens Reasoning Tokens
Gemini 3.5 Flash 5.6 9.9 33.3% 0 2.75s 8,122 3,456 0
Qwen3.6 Max Preview 3.8 7.3 22.2% 1 3.12s 7,913 456 0

Quick Compare

Switch Comparison Pair